EFFECTS OF STIMULUS REPETITION, DURATION, AND RISE TIME ON STARTLE BLINK AND AUTOMATICALLY ELICITED P300

被引:78
作者
PUTNAM, LE
ROTH, WT
机构
[1] STANFORD UNIV,MED CTR,DEPT PSYCHIAT & BEHAV SCI,STANFORD,CA 94305
[2] VET ADM MED CTR,PSYCHIAT SERV,PALO ALTO,CA 94304
关键词
Blink; Defense response; Event‐related potentials; P300; Startle; Stimulus duration; Stimulus rise time;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb00383.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Intense auditory stimuli of sudden onset evoke not only startle blinks but also an event‐related potential component resembling classic P300, even when subjects have no assigned task. To more closely examine the relationship of this P300 to startle, event‐related potentials and eyeblink were recorded from 16 young adults in three paradigms designed to produce wide variation in startle amplitude: an Habituation series of 30‐ms, 105dBA white noise bursts, a Duration paradigm which presented 105dB noise bursts for 3, 10, 30, or 90 ms, and a Rise Time paradigm which varied the rise/fall times (3, 15, 30, and 45 ms) of 110dBA, 1000‐Hz tone bursts. Subjects received two runs of each paradigm. Only on the final Duration and Rise Time runs were stimuli explicitly task relevant: on those runs subjects rated verbally, midway in each 8.4‐s interstimulus interval, the disturbingness of the prior sound. Although even the briefest noise bursts evoked parietal P300 as well as startle blink, P300 did not behave like startle, P300 habituated more slowly than did blink amplitude, was more responsive to sustained noise than were blink, N110, and P190, and most importantly, did not show the sensitivity to stimulus rise time manifested by these measures. These findings suggest that the amplitude of automatically elicited P300 is not governed by the same mechanisms as startle amplitude, but behaves more like a defense response. Copyright © 1990, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 297
页数:23
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]   CARDIAC AND BLINK REFLEX CONCOMITANTS OF ATTENTIONAL SELECTIVITY - A COMPARISON OF ADULTS AND YOUNG-CHILDREN [J].
ANTHONY, BJ ;
PUTNAM, LE .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 22 (05) :508-516
[3]  
BERG KM, 1973, DISS ABSTR INT B, V34, P5217
[4]   THE STARTLE RESPONSE AS AN INDICATOR OF TEMPORAL SUMMATION [J].
BLUMENTHAL, TD ;
BERG, WK .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1986, 40 (01) :62-68
[5]   STIMULUS RISE TIME, INTENSITY, AND BANDWIDTH EFFECTS ON ACOUSTIC STARTLE AMPLITUDE AND PROBABILITY [J].
BLUMENTHAL, TD ;
BERG, WK .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 23 (06) :635-641
[6]   INTEGRATION OF ENERGY AT THRESHOLD WITH GRADUAL RISE-FALL TONE PIPS [J].
DALLOS, PJ ;
OLSEN, WO .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1964, 36 (04) :743-&
[7]   COMPARISON OF RESPONSE PLASTICITY BETWEEN EYEBLINK AND VERTEX POTENTIAL IN HUMANS [J].
DAVIS, M ;
HENINGER, GR .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1972, 33 (03) :283-+
[8]   EFFECT OF TEMPORAL SUMMATION ON HUMAN STAPEDIUS REFLEX [J].
DJUPESLAND, G ;
ZWISLOCKI, JJ .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 1971, 71 (2-3) :262-+
[9]  
DJUPESLAND G, 1966, ACTA OTOLARYNGOLOG S, V224, P220
[10]   ON THE CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY [J].
DONCHIN, E ;
COLES, MGH .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1988, 11 (03) :408-427