RATIONING IN ACTION - DIMENSIONS OF RATIONING - WHO SHOULD DO WHAT

被引:62
作者
KLEIN, R
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.307.6899.309
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Priority setting is a complex interaction of multiple decisions at various levels in the organisation and constrained by history. There is no self evident set of ethical principles or analytical tools to determine what decisions we should take at various levels, nor is there an obvious or easy way to resolve the clash of claims on resources. To make priority setting more ''rational'' we should concentrate on the processes and structure of decision making and the relation of macro and micro decisions. The debate should promote reasoned, informed, and open argument, draw on a variety of perspectives, and involve a plurality of interests. The aim must be to build up, over time, the capacity to engage in continuous, collective argument.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 311
页数:3
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Beiner Ronald, 1983, POLITICAL JUDGMENT
  • [2] Cooper M. H., 1975, RATIONING HLTH CARE
  • [3] DUNNING AJ, 1992, REPORT GOVT COMMITTE
  • [4] GROVES T, 1993, BRIT MED J, V306, P673
  • [5] Ham C, 1988, HLTH CARE VARIATIONS
  • [6] HUNTER D, 1993, RATIONING DILEMMAS H
  • [7] KLEIN R, 1992, PATTERNS PRIORITIES
  • [8] Parker R., 1975, SOCIAL WELFARE MODER, P204
  • [9] 1992, REFORM HLTH CARE