COMMERCIAL TOKAMAK REACTOR POTENTIAL WITH ADVANCED TOKAMAK OPERATION

被引:53
作者
GALAMBOS, JD
PERKINS, LJ
HANEY, SW
MANDREKAS, J
机构
[1] LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATL LAB,LIVERMORE,CA 94550
[2] GEORGIA INST TECHNOL,ATLANTA,GA 30332
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0029-5515/35/5/I06
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
The attractiveness of future commercial tokamak reactors is sensitive to the attainable plasma performance, notably plasma energy confinement and allowable beta. The impact of varying levels of confinement and beta on the size and cost of the resulting tokamak reactor is systematically quantified. Several different classes of tokamak reactors are considered, and designs are optimized in terms of cost of electricity (COE) via a coupled physics/engineering/costing systems code. Surprisingly narrow ranges of plasma confinement and beta are found to be simultaneously useful in minimizing the reactor COE, i.e. improvement in only one of these quantities is not useful beyond some point without accompanying improvements in the other. For steady state, current driven reactors characterized by H mode confinement (where tau(E) = H tau(E,L); tau(E,L) being the confinement time predicted by the ITER-89 L mode scaling, and H similar to 2), the maximum useful Troyon beta coefficient (beta(N)) is only similar to 4.3%. mT/MA. These confinement levels are similar to those observed in present day experiments. If slightly better confinement is achievable (i.e. an enhancement factor over L mode of H similar to 2.5), the maximum useful Troyon coefficient increases to beta(N) similar to 6 and the reactor COE decreases by 20%. Inductively driven, pulsed reactors have somewhat increased useful ranges of confinement relative to the steady state cases. In general, increasing the allowable beta over presently accepted limits offers the single biggest improvement in reactor attractiveness of the tokamak concept.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 573
页数:23
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
BAKER CC, 1980, ANLFPP801 REP
[2]   A COMPARISON OF STEADY-STATE ARIES AND PULSED PULSAR TOKAMAK POWER-PLANTS [J].
BATHKE, CG .
FUSION TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 26 (03) :1163-1168
[3]  
BOTTURA L, 1991, ITER DOCUMENTATION S, V26
[4]  
COOKE PI, 1989, CLMR298 AEA CULH LAB
[5]  
DELENE JG, 1991, FUSION TECHNOL, V19, P807
[6]  
DELENE JG, 1990, COMMUNICATION
[7]  
DELENE JG, 1988, ORNLTM10728 REP
[8]  
DELENE JG, 1993, ORNLTM10071R3 REP
[9]   FUSION POWER ECONOMY OF SCALE [J].
DOLAN, TJ .
FUSION TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 24 (01) :97-111
[10]   INFLUENCE OF PHYSICS PARAMETERS ON TOKAMAK REACTOR DESIGN [J].
EHST, DA ;
EVANS, K ;
STACEY, WM .
NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 1979, 43 (01) :28-41