COCAINE-INDUCED TASTE-AVERSIONS - EFFECT OF ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION

被引:57
作者
FERRARI, CM
OCONNOR, DA
RILEY, AL
机构
[1] Psychopharmacology Laboratory, Department of Psychology The American University, Washington
基金
美国安德鲁·梅隆基金会;
关键词
CONDITIONED TASTE AVERSION; ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION; COCAINE; RAT;
D O I
10.1016/0091-3057(91)90277-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Female Long-Evans rats were given 20-min access to saccharin followed by either intraperitoneal (IP) or subcutaneous (SC) cocaine (18, 32 or 50 mg/kg) or vehicle. Aversions induced by IP-administered cocaine were relatively weak, with subjects at all doses decreasing consumption by 35% after four conditioning trials. On the other hand, aversions induced by SC-administered cocaine were robust, with subjects at the two highest doses (32 and 50 mg/kg) decreasing saccharin consumption by 95 and 98%, respectively, on the final aversion test. Although several possibilities exist for the diffential ability of IP and SC cocaine to induce taste aversions (e.g., longer duration of action with SC cocaine and the convulsant property of IP cocaine), the basis for this difference remains unknown. A secondary finding was the effect of route of administration on body weight. While all subjects receiving IP cocaine maintained or increased in body weight, subjects receiving the two highest doses of SC cocaine decreased in body weight by 3 and 5%, respectively. The differential effect of IP and SC cocaine on body weight may be due to cocaine's action on drinking and feeding or cocaine's leptogenic property. Independent of the mechanism underlying the differential ability of IP and SC administration to induce taste aversions and affect body weight, it is clear that route of administration may play an important role in the effects of cocaine.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 271
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
AMIT Z, 1980, NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, V16, P121
[2]   EFFECT OF COCAINE ON FOOD-INTAKE IN RATS [J].
BALOPOLE, DC ;
HANSULT, CD ;
DORPH, D .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1979, 64 (01) :121-122
[3]  
BENUCK M, 1987, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V243, P144
[4]   COMPARATIVE POTENCIES OF AMPHETAMINE, FENFLURAMINE AND RELATED COMPOUNDS IN TASTE-AVERSION EXPERIMENTS IN RATS [J].
BOOTH, DA ;
PILCHER, CWT ;
DMELLO, GD ;
STOLERMAN, IP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1977, 61 (04) :669-677
[5]  
BRAUN JJ, 1973, B PSYCHONOMIC SOC, V1, P419
[6]  
BURES J, 1977, FOOD AVERSION LEARNI, P219
[7]  
Cappell H., 1977, FOOD AVERSION LEARNI, P133
[8]  
DMELLO GD, 1981, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V219, P60
[9]   COMPARISON OF ORAL AND SUBCUTANEOUS ROUTES OF COCAINE ADMINISTRATION ON BEHAVIOR, PLASMA DRUG CONCENTRATION AND TOXICITY IN FEMALE RATS [J].
DOWEDWARDS, D ;
FICO, TA ;
OSMAN, M ;
GAMAGARIS, Z ;
HUTCHINGS, DE .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1989, 33 (01) :167-173
[10]  
FALK JL, 1990, MAY M BEH PHARM SOC