TRUNK MUSCLE COCONTRACTION - THE EFFECTS OF MOMENT DIRECTION AND MOMENT MAGNITUDE

被引:76
作者
LAVENDER, SA [1 ]
TSUANG, YH [1 ]
ANDERSSON, GBJ [1 ]
HAFEZI, A [1 ]
SHIN, CC [1 ]
机构
[1] NATL TAIWAN UNIV HOSP,DEPT ORTHOPAED SURG,TAIPEI 100,TAIWAN
关键词
COACTIVATION; ASYMMETRIC LOADING; LOW BACK PAIN; ERGONOMICS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; TRUNK MUSCLES;
D O I
10.1002/jor.1100100511
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This study investigated the cocontraction of eight trunk muscles during the application of asymmetric loads to the torso. External moments of 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 Nm were applied to the torso via a harness system. The direction of the applied moment was varied by 30-degrees increments to the subjects' right side between the sagittally symmetric orientations front and rear. Electromyographic (EMG) data from the left and right latissimus dorsi, erector spinae, external oblique, and rectus abdominus were collected from 10 subjects. The normalized EMG data were tested using multivariate and univariate analyses of variance procedures. These analyses showed significant interactions between the moment magnitude and the moment direction for seven of the eight muscles. Most of the interactions could be characterized as due to changes in muscle recruitment with changes in the direction of the external moment. Analysis of the relative activation levels, which were computed for each combination of moment magnitude and direction, indicated large changes in muscle recruitment due to asymmetry, but only small adjustments in the relative activation levels due to increased moment magnitude.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 700
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   EPIDEMIOLOGIC ASPECTS ON LOW-BACK-PAIN IN INDUSTRY [J].
ANDERSSON, GBJ .
SPINE, 1981, 6 (01) :53-60
[2]  
ANDERSSON GBJ, 1990, OCCUPATIONAL LOW BAC, P95
[3]  
ANDERSSON GBJ, 1991, ADULT SPINE PRINCIPL, P107
[4]   BIOMECHANICAL MODEL CALCULATION OF MUSCLE-CONTRACTION FORCES - A DOUBLE LINEAR-PROGRAMMING METHOD [J].
BEAN, JC ;
CHAFFIN, DB ;
SCHULTZ, AB .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1988, 21 (01) :59-66
[5]  
BERGQUISTULLMAN M, 1977, ACTA ORTHOP SCAND S, V170, P1
[6]  
CHAFFIN DB, 1970, AIIE T, V2, P16, DOI DOI 10.1080/05695557008974726AIITAJ0569-5554
[7]   A DYNAMIC BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF LIFTING MAXIMUM ACCEPTABLE LOADS [J].
FREIVALDS, A ;
CHAFFIN, DB ;
GARG, A ;
LEE, KS .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1984, 17 (04) :251-262
[8]   RISK-FACTORS IN LOW-BACK-PAIN - AN EPIDEMIOLOGICAL SURVEY [J].
FRYMOYER, JW ;
POPE, MH ;
CLEMENTS, JH ;
WILDER, DG ;
MACPHERSON, B ;
ASHIKAGA, T .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1983, 65 (02) :213-218
[9]   MAXIMUM ACCEPTABLE WEIGHTS AND MAXIMUM VOLUNTARY ISOMETRIC STRENGTHS FOR ASYMMETRIC LIFTING [J].
GARG, A ;
BADGER, D .
ERGONOMICS, 1986, 29 (07) :879-892
[10]   THE EFFECTS OF EXTERNAL BENDING MOMENTS ON LUMBAR MUSCLE FORCE DISTRIBUTION [J].
LADIN, Z ;
MURTHY, KR ;
DE LUCA, CJ .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1991, 113 (03) :284-294