EVALUATION OF A COMMERCIAL ENZYME-LINKED-IMMUNOSORBENT-ASSAY FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF PARATUBERCULOSIS IN DAIRY-CATTLE

被引:151
作者
SWEENEY, RW
WHITLOCK, RH
BUCKLEY, CL
SPENCER, PA
机构
[1] Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Kennett Square
关键词
D O I
10.1177/104063879500700411
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The performance of a commercially available ELISA for detection of antibodies to Mycobacterium paratuberculosis was evaluated using sera from 1,146 cows. Samples were from uninfected cattle, infected subclinical cattle shedding low numbers of organism in feces, subclinical heavy shedders, clinical cases, and randomly selected cattle in a slaughterhouse survey for paratuberculosis. The overall sensitivity of the test, using the manufacturer's recommended cutoff was 45% 1-4.8%, and the specificity was 99% +/- 0.9%. The ELISA result was significantly correlated with the number of colonies of M. paratuberculosis detected by fecal culturing. The sensitivity of the test was highest for clinical cases of paratuberculosis (87% +/- 8.4%), and lowest for subclinical, Light-shedding cattle (15% +/- 6.6%). Changing the cutoff point did not improve performance of the test. Evaluating ELISA results with a kinetics-based method reduced plate-to-plate variation in results but did not improve performance of the test based on receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:488 / 493
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Collins M.T., Angulo A., Buergelt C.D., Et al., Reproducibility of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for bovine paratuberculosis among eight laboratories, J Vet Diagn Invest, 5, pp. 52-55, (1993)
[2]  
Collins M.T., Sockett D.C., Ridge S., Cox J.C., Evaluation of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Johne's disease, J Clin Microbiol, 29, pp. 272-276, (1991)
[3]  
Cox J.C., Drane D.P., Jones S.L., Et al., Development and evaluation of a rapid absorbed enzyme immunoassay test for the diagnosis of Johne's disease in cattle, Australian Vet J, 68, pp. 157-160, (1991)
[4]  
DeLong E.R., DeLong D.M., Clarke-Pearson D.L., Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach, Biometrics, 44, pp. 837-845, (1988)
[5]  
Hanley J.A., McNeil B.J., The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Radiology, 143, pp. 29-36, (1982)
[6]  
Hanley J.A., McNeil B.J., A method of comparing the area under two ROC curves derived from the same cases, Radiology, 148, pp. 839-843, (1983)
[7]  
Jacobson R.H., Downing D.R., Lynch T.J., Computer-assisted enzyme immunoassays and simplified immunofluorescence assays: Applications for the diagnostic laboratory and the veterinarian's office, J Am Vet Med Assoc, 181, pp. 1166-1168, (1982)
[8]  
Kim Y.G., Beth-Nielsen S., Gordon J.C., Et al., Comparison of 2 methods for isolation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis, Am J Vet Res, 50, pp. 1110-1113, (1989)
[9]  
McNab W.B., Meek A.H., Duncan R.J., Et al., An evaluation of selected screening tests for bovine paratuberculosis, Can J Vet Res, 55, pp. 252-259, (1991)
[10]  
Merkal R.S., Curran B.L., Growth and metabolic characteristics of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis, Appl Microbiol, 28, pp. 276-279, (1974)