Liberalism, Postmaterialism, and the Growth of Freedom

被引:56
作者
Welzel, Christian [2 ]
Inglehart, Ronald [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, ISR, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] IUB, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Bremen, Germany
来源
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY-REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE SOCIOLOGIE | 2005年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/03906700500038579
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
An influential analysis by Przeworski and Limongi (1997) argued that a pro-democratic culture may help existing democracies survive, but political culture does not contribute to the process of democratization, which is entirely done by elites. We challenge this conclusion, arguing that it neglects the very nature of democratization. For (as Human Development theory argues), democratization is a liberating process that maximizes human freedom by establishing civil and political rights. Consequently, the aspect of political culture that is most relevant to democratization is mass aspirations for freedom - and if a given public emphasizes these values relatively strongly, democratization is likely to occur. To test this thesis, we use data from the Values Surveys, demonstrating that a specific component of postmaterialism ('liberty aspirations') had a major impact on the extent to which societies gained or lost freedom during the Third Wave of democratization. This effect holds up in tests of Granger causality, remaining strong when we control for prior levels of freedom. No other indicator, including GDP/capita and social capital, can explain away the impact of liberty aspirations on democratization. Mass liberty aspirations play a role in democratization that has been greatly underestimated.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 108
页数:28
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Almond Gabriel., 1989, CIVIC CULTURE REVISI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, PROMOTING POLYARCHY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, DECLINE DEFERENCE
[4]  
Barnes S., 1979, POLITICAL ACTION
[5]  
Barro R., 1997, DETERMINANTS EC GROW
[6]   CONDITIONS OF DEMOCRACY IN INTERWAR EUROPE - A BOOLEAN TEST OF MAJOR HYPOTHESES [J].
BERGSCHLOSSER, D ;
DEMEUR, G .
COMPARATIVE POLITICS, 1994, 26 (03) :253-279
[7]   CIVIL-SOCIETY AND DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION IN EAST-CENTRAL-EUROPE [J].
BERNHARD, M .
POLITICAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1993, 108 (02) :307-326
[8]   Endogenous democratization [J].
Boix, C ;
Stokes, SC .
WORLD POLITICS, 2003, 55 (04) :517-+
[9]   POLITICAL DEMOCRACY AND THE SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME [J].
BOLLEN, KA ;
JACKMAN, RW .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1985, 50 (04) :438-457
[10]   Subjective measures of liberal democracy [J].
Bollen, KA ;
Paxton, P .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2000, 33 (01) :58-86