PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROJEJUNOSTOMY - A DUAL CENTER SAFETY AND EFFICACY TRIAL

被引:45
作者
DELEGGE, MH
DUCKWORTH, F
MCHENRY, L
FOXXORENSTEIN, A
CRAIG, RM
KIRBY, DF
机构
[1] VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIV,MED COLL VIRGINIA,DIV GASTROENTEROL,NUTR SECT,RICHMOND,VA 23298
[2] NORTHWESTERN UNIV HOSP,DIV GASTROENTEROL,CHICAGO,IL
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0148607195019003239
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Although jejunal tube placement through a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has not been proven to be preferable to PEG feeding, it would be theoretically advantageous for those patients prone to gastrointestinal aspiration. However, reliable placement of a small bowel feeding tube through a PEG has been technically difficult. We have previously reported successful placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy (PEG/J) with minimal complications. These results are in contrast to other series that report technical difficulty, frequent tube dysfunction and gastric aspiration. We describe an over-the-wire PEG/J technique performed by multiple operators at two medical centers. Gastrostomy tube placement was successful in 94% of patients. Initial placement of the jejunal tube was successful in 88% of patients. Second attempts were 100% successful. The average procedure time was 36 minutes. The distal duodenal and jejunal placement of the jejunal tube resulted in no episodes of gastroduodenal reflux. Complications included jejunal tube migration (6%), clogging (18%), and unintentional removal (11%). The majority of patients were ultimately converted to either oral or intragastric feedings. We conclude that the PEG/J system is a reliable, reproducible method of small bowel feeding and is associated with no episodes of tube feeding reflux when the jejunal tube is positioned in the distal duodenum or beyond. Furthermore, it provides a temporary nutritional bridge for those patients who are later transitioned to either PEG or oral feeding.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 243
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Gauderer M.W.L., Ponsky J.L., Izant R.J., Jr: Gastrostomy without laparotomy : A percutaneous endoscopic technique, J Pediatr Surg, 15, pp. 872-875, (1980)
[2]  
Gauderer M.W.L., Ponsky J.L., A simplified technique for constructing a feeding gastrostomy, Surg Gynecol & Obstet, 152, pp. 83-85, (1981)
[3]  
Scott J.S., De La Torre R.A., Unger S.W., Comparison of operative versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in the elderly, Am Surg, 57, pp. 338-340, (1991)
[4]  
Moore F.A., Moore E.E., Jones T.N., Et al., TEN versus TPN following abdominal trauma: a reduced septic morbidity, J Trauma, 29, pp. 874-880, (1989)
[5]  
Moore F.A., Feliciano D.V., Andrassy R.J., Et al., Early enteral feeding, compared with parenteral, reduces postoperative septic complications: The results of a meta-analysis, Ann Surg, 216, pp. 172-183, (1992)
[6]  
Kudsk K.A., Croce M.A., Fabian T.C., Et al., Enteral versus parenteral feeding: Effect of septic morbidity after blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma, Ann Surg, 215, pp. 503-511, (1992)
[7]  
Deitch E.A., Winterton J., Li M., Et al., The gut as a portal of entry for bacteremia: Role of protein malnutrition, Ann Surg, 205, pp. 681-690, (1987)
[8]  
Ibanez J., Penafiel A., Raurich J., Et al., Gastroesophageal reflux and aspiration of gastric contents during nasogastric feedings (Abstr). Intensive, Care Med, 14, 2, (1988)
[9]  
Weltz C.R., Morris J.B., Mullen J.L., Surgical jejunostomy in aspiration risk patients, Ann Surg, 207, pp. 140-145, (1992)
[10]  
Montecalvo M.A., Steger K., Farber H.W., Et al., Nutritional outcome and pneumonia in critical care patients randomized to gastric versus jejunal tube feedings, Crit Care Med, 20, pp. 1377-1387, (1992)