ACQUISITION OF A SPATIALLY DEFINED OPERANT WITH DELAYED REINFORCEMENT

被引:46
作者
CRITCHFIELD, TS [1 ]
LATTAL, KA [1 ]
机构
[1] W VIRGINIA UNIV,DEPT PSYCHOL,MORGANTOWN,WV 26506
关键词
ACQUISITION; REINFORCEMENT DELAY; OPERANT BEHAVIOR; SPATIAL LOCATION; RATS;
D O I
10.1901/jeab.1993.59-373
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Two experiments investigated the role of an immediate, response-produced auditory stimulus during acquisition, via delayed reinforcement, of a response selected to control for possible unprogrammed, operandum-related sources of response feedback. Experimentally naive rats were exposed to a delayed-food reinforcement condition, specifically a tandem fixed-ratio 1 differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior 30-s schedule. The response was defined as breaking a photocell beam located near the ceiling at the rear of the operant conditioning chamber. In Experiment 1, rates of photobeam breaking by each rat increased from near zero, regardless of the presence or absence of a tone that immediately followed the response initiating the delay interval. Though not essential, the tone facilitated response acquisition and resulted in more efficient response patterns at stability. Experiment 2 demonstrated that photobeam-breaking response rates under the delayed reinforcement contingency exceeded those in a preceding baseline condition in which no food was delivered. In addition, upon introduction of the delayed reinforcement procedure, correspondence between response patterns and the requirements of the reinforcement schedule increased over baseline levels in the absence of a food contingency. Together with a previous report of Lattal and Gleeson (1990), the present results suggest that response acquisition with delayed reinforcement is a robust phenomenon that may not depend on a mechanically defined response or an immediate external stimulus change to mediate the temporal gap between response and reinforcer.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 387
页数:15
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   STIMULUS COMPLEXITY AND SENSORY REINFORCEMENT [J].
BARNES, GW ;
BARON, A .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1961, 54 (04) :466-&
[2]   CHOICE AS TIME ALLOCATION [J].
BAUM, WM ;
RACHLIN, HC .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1969, 12 (06) :861-&
[3]   THE BATHWATER AND EVERYTHING [J].
BOLLES, RC .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1988, 11 (03) :449-450
[4]   AUTO-SHAPING OF PIGEONS KEY-PECK [J].
BROWN, PL ;
JENKINS, HM .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1968, 11 (01) :1-&
[5]   ANALYSIS OF LONGITUDINAL TIME-SERIES DATA IN TOXICOLOGY [J].
COX, C ;
CORYSLECHTA, DA .
FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1987, 8 (02) :159-169
[6]   RESPONSE BY THE RAT TO ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE [J].
DEMBER, WN .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1956, 49 (01) :93-95
[7]  
Edgington E.S., 1980, RANDOMIZATION TESTS
[8]   GENERAL ACTIVITY AS INSTRUMENTAL - APPLICATION TO AVOIDANCE TRAINING [J].
GRAF, V ;
BITTERMAN, ME .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1963, 6 (02) :301-&
[9]   THE RELATION OF SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT TO DELAYED REWARD IN VISUAL DISCRIMINATION LEARNING [J].
GRICE, GR .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1948, 38 (01) :1-16
[10]   DELAY OF REWARD AND PERFORMANCE OF AN INSTRUMENTAL RESPONSE [J].
HARKER, GS .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1956, 51 (05) :303-310