MEASURING COMPETENCE - EXPLORING FIRM EFFECTS IN PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH

被引:1308
作者
HENDERSON, R [1 ]
COCKBURN, I [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV BRITISH COLUMBIA,FAC COMMERCE & BUSINESS ADM,VANCOUVER,BC,CANADA
关键词
FIRM EFFECTS; ORGANIZATIONAL COMPETENCE; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.1002/smj.4250150906
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Renewed interest in the resource-based theory of the firm has focused attention on the role of heterogeneous organizational 'competence' in competition. This paper attempts to measure the importance of these effects in the context of pharmaceutical research. We distinguish between 'component' and 'architectural' competence, and using internal firm data at the program level from 10 major pharmaceutical companies show that together the two forms of competence appear to explain a significant fraction of the variance in research productivity across firms. Our results raise some intriguing questions about the nature of competencies and the ways in which they diffuse over time.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 84
页数:22
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Allen T. J., 1977, MANAGING FLOW TECHNO
[2]   R AND D PERFORMANCE AS A FUNCTION OF INTERNAL COMMUNICATION, PROJECT-MANAGEMENT, AND THE NATURE OF THE WORK [J].
ALLEN, TJ ;
LEE, DMS ;
TUSHMAN, ML .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1980, 27 (01) :2-12
[3]   STRATEGIC ASSETS AND ORGANIZATIONAL RENT [J].
AMIT, R ;
SCHOEMAKER, PJH .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1993, 14 (01) :33-46
[4]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[5]  
Barney J. B., 1986, Management Science, V32, P1231, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231
[7]  
Christensen C., 1992, PROD OPER MANAG, V1, P334, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1937-5956.1992.TB00001.X, 10.1111/j.1937-5956.1992.tb00001.x]
[8]  
CLARK K, 1991, PRODUCT DEV WORLD AU
[9]  
COCKBURN I, 1988, AM ECON REV, V78, P419
[10]   RACING TO INVEST? THE DYNAMICS OF COMPETITION IN ETHICAL DRUG DISCOVERY [J].
Cockburn, Iain ;
Henderson, Rebecca .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 1994, 3 (03) :481-519