DETECTION OF CAROTID STENOSIS - FROM NASCET RESULTS TO CLINICAL-PRACTICE

被引:53
作者
CHANG, YJ [1 ]
GOLBY, AJ [1 ]
ALBERS, GW [1 ]
机构
[1] STANFORD STROKE CTR,PALO ALTO,CA 94304
关键词
ANGIOGRAPHY; CAROTID STENOSIS; ULTRASONICS;
D O I
10.1161/01.STR.26.8.1325
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose Results from large multicenter studies have shown that carotid endarterectomy, performed with low perioperative morbidity and mortality, is beneficial for patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis greater than or equal to 70% as calculated according to strict angiographic criteria. To apply these results in clinical practice, individual institutions should determine whether locally implemented duplex ultrasonography adequately identifies patients with greater than or equal to 70% stenosis and whether the degree of stenosis reported by local angiographers correlates with strict angiographic measurements. Methods We compared estimates of carotid stenosis obtained by duplex ultrasonography and the radiologists' reports from conventional cerebral angiography with each other and with results obtained using North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) criteria. Results One hundred seventy-one vessels were available for review. In 155 (91%) of the cases, the reports from the ultrasound and angiogram were in agreement with regard to whether the stenosis was greater than or equal to 70% or < 70%. In 11 of the 16 cases where there was a disparity between the studies, the ultrasound was in closer agreement with measurements obtained using NASCET criteria. Nine of the angiography reports overestimated the degree of stenosis compared with NASCET measurements; twice angiography underestimated the stenosis. Twice the ultrasound underestimated the stenosis, and three times it overestimated the stenosis. Conclusions Duplex ultrasonography was highly sensitive for detecting significant carotid stenosis at our institution; however, angiography reports often graded the degree of stenosis to be more severe than measurements obtained using NASCET criteria. Institutions that evaluate patients for carotid endarterectomy should investigate the correlation between their ultrasound and angiographic studies so that the results of carotid endarterectomy trials can be accurately applied.
引用
收藏
页码:1325 / 1328
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   MEASURING CAROTID STENOSIS - TIME FOR A REAPPRAISAL [J].
ALEXANDROV, AV ;
BLADIN, CF ;
MAGGISANO, R ;
NORRIS, JW .
STROKE, 1993, 24 (09) :1292-1296
[2]   CAROTID BIFURCATION IMAGING - MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY AND DOPPLER ULTRASOUND [J].
BUIJS, PC ;
KLOP, RBJ ;
EIKELBOOM, BC ;
MALI, WPTM ;
BAKKER, CJG ;
BEEK, FJA ;
VANGILS, APG ;
DILLON, EH ;
RAMOS, LMP .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1993, 7 (03) :245-251
[3]   IS DUPLEX SCANNING SUFFICIENT EVALUATION BEFORE CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY [J].
GEUDER, JW ;
LAMPARELLO, PJ ;
RILES, TS ;
GIANGOLA, G ;
IMPARATO, AM .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1989, 9 (02) :193-201
[4]   CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY AND PREVENTION OF CEREBRAL-ISCHEMIA IN SYMPTOMATIC CAROTID STENOSIS [J].
MAYBERG, MR ;
WILSON, SE ;
YATSU, F ;
WEISS, DG ;
MESSINA, L ;
HERSHEY, LA ;
COLLING, C ;
ESKRIDGE, J ;
DEYKIN, D ;
WINN, HR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 266 (23) :3289-3294
[5]   BLINDED-READER COMPARISON OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY AND DUPLEX ULTRASONOGRAPHY FOR CAROTID-ARTERY BIFURCATION STENOSIS [J].
MITTL, RL ;
BRODERICK, M ;
CARPENTER, JP ;
GOLDBERG, HI ;
LISTRUD, J ;
MISHKIN, MM ;
BERKOWITZ, HD ;
ATLAS, SW .
STROKE, 1994, 25 (01) :4-10
[6]   CORRELATION OF NORTH-AMERICAN SYMPTOMATIC CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY TRIAL (NASCET) ANGIOGRAPHIC DEFINITION OF 70-PERCENT TO 99-PERCENT INTERNAL CAROTID-ARTERY STENOSIS WITH DUPLEX SCANNING [J].
MONETA, GL ;
EDWARDS, JM ;
CHITWOOD, RW ;
TAYLOR, LM ;
LEE, RW ;
CUMMINGS, CA ;
PORTER, JM ;
THIELE, B ;
HOBSON, R ;
RICOTTA, J ;
HUNINK, M ;
CUNHA, SS ;
BARNES, R .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1993, 17 (01) :152-159
[7]   GUIDELINES FOR CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY - A MULTIDISCIPLINARY CONSENSUS STATEMENT FROM THE AD-HOC-COMMITTEE, AMERICAN-HEART-ASSOCIATION [J].
MOORE, WS ;
BARNETT, HJM ;
BEEBE, HG ;
BERNSTEIN, EF ;
BRENER, BJ ;
BROTT, T ;
CAPLAN, LR ;
DAY, A ;
GOLDSTONE, J ;
HOBSON, RW ;
KEMPCZINSKI, RF ;
MATCHAR, DB ;
MAYBERG, MR ;
NICOLAIDES, AN ;
NORRIS, JW ;
RICOTTA, JJ ;
ROBERTSON, JT ;
RUTHERFORD, RB ;
THOMAS, D ;
TOOLE, JF ;
TROUT, HH ;
WIEBERS, DO .
STROKE, 1995, 26 (01) :188-201
[8]  
PELZ DM, 1993, CAN ASSOC RADIOL J, V44, P247
[9]  
SPARTERA C, 1993, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V34, P209
[10]  
TSURUDA JS, 1991, CIRCULATION, V83, P176