NEOADJUVANT (PREEMPTIVE) CISPLATIN THERAPY IN INVASIVE TRANSITIONAL CELL-CARCINOMA OF THE BLADDER

被引:135
作者
WALLACE, DMA
RAGHAVAN, D
KELLY, KA
SANDEMAN, TF
CONN, IG
TERIANA, N
DUNN, J
BOULAS, J
LATIEF, T
机构
[1] W MIDLANDS CANC RES CAMPAIGN CLIN TRIALS UNIT,BIRMINGHAM,ENGLAND
[2] PETER MACCALLUM CANC INST,MELBOURNE,AUSTRALIA
[3] QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSP,DEPT RADIOTHERAPY,BIRMINGHAM B15 2TH,W MIDLANDS,ENGLAND
[4] ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSP,SYDNEY,AUSTRALIA
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 1991年 / 67卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.1991.tb15225.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Following 2 pilot studies which showed 57 and 61% response rates to intravenous cisplatin for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder prior to definitive treatment, the West Midlands Urological Research Group (WMURG) and the Australian Bladder Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) independently began randomised trials to test the survival benefit of neo-adjuvant intravenous cisplatin prior to radiotherapy in T2-T4 MO transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Both trials failed to recruit their target numbers of 250 patients in the West Midlands and 320 in Australia. Since they had similar treatment protocols and eligibility criteria, they were combined in an overview analysis, achieving a total number of 255 patients. Each treatment group was compared with its own control group and the differences were pooled to give an overall result. There was no difference in survival between treated and control patients. The odds ratio was 1.13 with the control groups faring marginally better than the chemotherapy groups. Even with 255 patients the 95% confidence interval of the odds ratio was wide (0.80-1.57). Although there is no clear evidence of a clinically worthwhile benefit from neo-adjuvant cisplatin, this approach must be tested in a larger study using combination treatments with greater activity in metastatic disease.
引用
收藏
页码:608 / 615
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
BLOOM HJG, 1982, BR J UROL, V54, P16
[2]   CIS-DIAMMINEDICHLOROPLATINUM (DDP) AS INITIAL TREATMENT OF INVASIVE BLADDER-CANCER [J].
FAGG, SL ;
DAWSONEDWARDS, P ;
HUGHES, MA ;
LATIEF, TN ;
ROLFE, EB ;
FIELDING, JWL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1984, 56 (03) :296-300
[3]  
HENDERSON IC, 1988, NEW ENGL J MED, V319, P1681
[4]   A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF CISPLATIN VERSUS CISPLATIN PLUS METHOTREXATE IN ADVANCED CANCER OF THE UROTHELIAL TRACT [J].
HILLCOAT, BL ;
RAGHAVAN, D ;
MATTHEWS, J ;
KEFFORD, R ;
YUEN, K ;
WOODS, R ;
OLVER, I ;
BISHOP, J ;
PEARSON, B ;
COOREY, G ;
LEVI, J ;
ABBOTT, RL ;
ARONEY, R ;
GILL, PG ;
MCLENNAN, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 7 (06) :706-709
[5]   NONPARAMETRIC-ESTIMATION FROM INCOMPLETE OBSERVATIONS [J].
KAPLAN, EL ;
MEIER, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1958, 53 (282) :457-481
[6]   COMPARATIVE ACTIVITY AND TOXICITY OF CIS-DIAMMINEDICHLOROPLATINUM (DDP) AND A COMBINATION OF DOXORUBICIN, CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, AND DDP IN DISSEMINATED TRANSITIONAL CELL CARCINOMAS OF THE URINARY-TRACT [J].
KHANDEKAR, JD ;
ELSON, PJ ;
DEWYS, WD ;
SLAYTON, RE ;
HARRIS, DT .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1985, 3 (04) :539-545
[7]  
LOEHRER PJ, 1990, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V9, P132
[8]   NEOADJUVANT TREATMENT OF STAGE-T2 TO STAGE-T4 BLADDER-CANCER WITH CIS-PLATINUM, CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE AND DOXORUBICIN [J].
MCCULLOUGH, DL ;
COOPER, RM ;
YEAMAN, LD ;
LOOMER, L ;
WOODRUFF, RD ;
BOYCE, WH ;
HARRISON, LH ;
ASSIMOS, DG ;
LYNCH, DF .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 141 (04) :849-852
[9]   DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS REQUIRING PROLONGED OBSERVATION OF EACH PATIENT .2. ANALYSIS AND EXAMPLES [J].
PETO, R ;
PIKE, MC ;
ARMITAGE, P ;
BRESLOW, NE ;
COX, DR ;
HOWARD, SV ;
MANTEL, N ;
MCPHERSON, K ;
PETO, J ;
SMITH, PG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1977, 35 (01) :1-39
[10]  
RAGHAVAN D, 1985, J UROLOGY, V133, P399, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)48995-6