BIOEFFECTS OF HIGH MAGNETIC-FIELDS - A STUDY USING A SIMPLE ANIMAL-MODEL

被引:24
作者
WEISS, J [1 ]
HERRICK, RC [1 ]
TABER, KH [1 ]
CONTANT, C [1 ]
PLISHKER, GA [1 ]
机构
[1] BAYLOR COLL MED,CTR MAGNET RESONANCE,9450 GROGANS MILL RD,SUITE 110,THE WOODLANDS,TX 77380
关键词
MAGNETIC RESONANCE; BIOSAFETY; STATIC MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS;
D O I
10.1016/0730-725X(92)90021-Q
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The desire to do clinical imaging and spectroscopy at magnetic field strengths greater than 2 Tesla (T) necessitates investigation of possible bioeffects at these high fields. A simple T-maze was utilized to evaluate the aversive effects of exposure to three levels of static magnetic field (0, 1.5, and 4 T). The right arm of the maze extended into the center of a 30-cm horizontal bore magnet, while the left arm extended into a mock magnet bore with the same dimensions. The self-shielded design of the magnet reduces the fringe field to zero within 1 m of the bore, placing the start box of the maze outside the 5-G line of the magnet. Each rat performed a total of ten trials at each level of magnetic field strength. A follow-up subset was run at 4 T with the maze reversed. At 0 T, the rats entered the magnet freely. No significant differences from the control were observed at 1.5 T. At 4 T, however, in 97% of the trials the rats would not enter the magnet. In the maze-reversed subset a majority of the rats turned toward the magnet, indicating that they had learned an aversive response from the previous trials at 4 T. However, in only 4 decisions out of 58 did the rats actually enter the magnet. Eighteen decisions to turn around were made at the edge of the magnet in a region of strong field gradients (up to 13 T/m) and a field strength up to 1.75 T. We propose that the aversive response is most likely due to magnetic induction effects caused by motion in a strong magnetic field gradient.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 694
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Schenck, Health and physiological effects of human exposure to whole body four tesla magnetic fields during MRI, Biological Effects and Safety Aspects of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy, (1991)
[2]  
Hallett, Cohen, Magnetism, JAMA, 264, pp. 538-541, (1989)
[3]  
Cohen, Weisskoff, Rzedzian, Kantor, Sensory stimulation by time-varying magnetic fields, Magn. Res. Med., 14, pp. 409-414, (1990)
[4]  
Innis, Ossenkopp, Prato, Sestini, Behavioral effects of exposure to nuclear magnetic resonance imaging: II. Spatial memory tests, Magn. Res. Imaging, 4, (1986)
[5]  
Smirnova, Behavior in rats in “open field” following the action of a magnetic field, Zhurnal Uysskei Nervoi, 32, (1982)
[6]  
Anderson, Biological response of animals to time-varying magnetic fields, Biological Effects and Safety Aspects of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy, (1991)
[7]  
Weaver, Astumin, The response of living cells to very weak electric fields: The thermal noise limit, Science, 247, pp. 459-462, (1990)
[8]  
McLeod, Lee, Ehrlich, Frequency dependence of electric field modulation of fibroblast protein synthesis, Science, 236, pp. 1465-1469, (1987)
[9]  
Oman, Young, The physiological range of pressure difference and cupula deflections in the human semicircular canal, Acta Otolaryngol., 74, pp. 324-331, (1972)