USE OF ODOR BAITS IN TRAPS TO TEST REACTIONS TO INTRASPECIFIC AND INTERSPECIFIC CHEMICAL CUES IN HOUSE MICE LIVING IN OUTDOOR ENCLOSURES

被引:27
作者
DRICKAMER, LC
MIKESIC, DG
SHAFFER, KS
机构
[1] Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, 62901, IL
关键词
HOUSE MOUSE; MUS-MUSCULUS; ODOR BAITS; CHEMICAL CUES; CHEMOSIGNALS; PHEROMONES; MICROTUS-OCHROGASTER; PEROMYSCUS-LEUCOPUS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; HOMO-SAPIENS; CANIS-FAMILIARIS; FELIS-DOMESTICUS; PREDATORS; COMPETITION;
D O I
10.1007/BF00984947
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
House mice (Mus musculus) living in outdoor enclosures were tested for urinary chemical cue preferences using odor-baited traps. In the first experiment, with only volatile cues available, odors from conspecific males and females of various age classes and reproductive conditions were tested; no preferences were exhibited. In the second experiment mice had both nonvolatile and volatile cues available from the same sources as in experiment 1. All age and sex class and female reproductive condition groups exhibited odor cue preferences except juvenile females. There were no specific odor cue preferences exhibited by any of the responder types with regard to odors from juvenile females. In the third and fifth experiments, mice were presented with nonvolatile plus volatile or only volatile urine odor cues, respectively, from four genera, Mus, Peromyscus, Microtus, and Homo. Mice of all age classes and both sexes preferred Mus musculus odor, were neutral toward Microtus ochrogaster odor, and avoided odors from Peromyscus leucopus and Homo sapiens; these patterns were the same regardless of whether only volatile or both volatile and nonvolatile cues were presented. The fourth and sixth experiments involved testing volatile cues only and volatile cues plus nonvolatile cues from human sweat or feces from dogs, cats, or shrews. Mice avoided the human sweat and feces from cats and shrews, but were neutral toward the odor of dog feces. There were effects on whether mice were trapped in the interior of the enclosure or on the perimeter for some odors tested in these six experiments. The findings provide insights regarding possible functions of odor cues in the behavioral ecology of house mice. Odor-baiting traps can be an effective tool with respect to testing some, but not all questions pertaining to olfactory cues and house mouse social biology.
引用
收藏
页码:2223 / 2250
页数:28
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Albone ES, 1984, MAMMALIAN SEMIOCHEMI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1956, NONPARAMETRIC STAT B
[3]   SPATIAL AND POPULATION RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MICROTUS AND BLARIN-A [J].
BARBEHENN, KR .
ECOLOGY, 1958, 39 (02) :293-304
[4]  
BOONSTRA R, 1976, J ZOOL, V180, P467
[5]   MICE - INDIVIDUAL RECOGNITION BY OLFACTORY CUES [J].
BOWERS, JM ;
ALEXANDE.BK .
SCIENCE, 1967, 158 (3805) :1208-&
[6]  
Bronson F. H., 1976, Mammalian olfaction, reproductive processes, and behavior., P119
[7]   REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY OF THE HOUSE MOUSE [J].
BRONSON, FH .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 1979, 54 (03) :265-299
[8]  
BRONSON FH, 1989, MAMMALIAN REPRODUCTI
[9]  
Caldwell L. D., 1964, Journal of Mammalogy, V45, P12, DOI 10.2307/1377290
[10]   INTERACTIONS OF PEROMYSCUS AND MUS IN A ONE-ACRE FIELD ENCLOSURE [J].
CALDWELL, LD ;
GENTRY, JB .
ECOLOGY, 1965, 46 (1-2) :189-192