HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS IN FALSE-NEGATIVE ARCHIVAL CERVICAL SMEARS - IMPLICATIONS FOR SCREENING FOR CERVICAL-CANCER

被引:61
作者
WALBOOMERS, JMM
HUSMAN, AMD
SNIJDERS, PJF
STEL, HV
RISSE, EKJ
HELMERHORST, TJM
VOORHORST, FJ
MEIJER, CJLM
机构
[1] FREE UNIV AMSTERDAM HOSP, DEPT GYNAECOL, 1081 HV AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
[2] FREE UNIV AMSTERDAM HOSP, DEPT EPIDEMIOL & BIOSTAT, 1081 HV AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
[3] GOOI NOORD HOSP, DEPT PATHOL, BLARICUM, NETHERLANDS
关键词
PCR; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS; CERVICAL CANCER; SCREENING;
D O I
10.1136/jcp.48.8.728
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Aim-To assess the value of detecting human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in false negative archival cervical smears in population based screening programmes for cervical cancer. Methods-Cytomorphologically classified false negative archival Pap smears (n = 27) taken from 18 women up to six years before cervical cancer was diagnosed were blindly mixed with 89 smears from hospital patients with a variety of gynaecological complaints and tested for HPV by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Corresponding cervical cancer biopsy specimens were also available for HPV analysis. Neither the examining cytopathologist nor the molecular biologist was aware of the study design. Results-HPV DNA was detected in the smears of 16 patients with cervical cancer missed previously by cytology, HPV 16 and 18 were found predominantly in those smears taken up to six years before the diagnosis of cervical cancer. The smears of the two remaining patients were reclassified as inadequate for cytology or contained no suitable DNA for PCR. In 15 patients the same HPV type could be found in the smears and the cervical cancer biopsy specimens. Conclusions-The results indicate that high risk HPV types can be detected in archival smears classified as false negative on cytology and that cytological screening errors may be reduced if combined with PCR testing for HPV.
引用
收藏
页码:728 / 732
页数:5
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1986, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V293, P659
  • [2] HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUSES ASSOCIATED WITH CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA - GREAT DIVERSITY AND DISTINCT DISTRIBUTION IN LOW-GRADE AND HIGH-GRADE LESIONS
    BERGERON, C
    BARRASSO, R
    BEAUDENON, S
    FLAMANT, P
    CROISSANT, O
    ORTH, G
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1992, 16 (07) : 641 - 649
  • [3] RAPID AND SIMPLE METHOD FOR PURIFICATION OF NUCLEIC-ACIDS
    BOOM, R
    SOL, CJA
    SALIMANS, MMM
    JANSEN, CL
    WERTHEIMVANDILLEN, PME
    VANDERNOORDAA, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1990, 28 (03) : 495 - 503
  • [4] BOYES DA, 1981, CANCER, V48, P613, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19810715)48:1+<613::AID-CNCR2820481328>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-Z
  • [6] CAMPION MJ, 1986, LANCET, V2, P237
  • [7] CHRISTOPHERSON WM, 1976, CANCER, V38, P1357, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197609)38:3<1357::AID-CNCR2820380340>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-A
  • [9] ESTIMATION OF SCREENING ERROR RATE FROM OBSERVED DETECTION RATES IN REPEATED CERVICAL CYTOLOGY
    COPPLESON, LW
    BROWN, B
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1974, 119 (07) : 953 - 958
  • [10] CRAMER DW, 1974, CANCER, V34, P2018, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197412)34:6<2018::AID-CNCR2820340621>3.0.CO