THE FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE - A COMPARATIVE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY

被引：380

作者：

KIDD, D ^{[1
]}

STEWART, G ^{[1
]}

BALDRY, J ^{[1
]}

JOHNSON, J ^{[1
]}

ROSSITER, D ^{[1
]}

PETRUCKEVITCH, A ^{[1
]}

THOMPSON, AJ ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] UCL INST NEUROL, INST NEUROL, NEUROREHABIL UNIT, LONDON WC1N 3BG, ENGLAND

来源：

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION | 1995年 / 17卷 / 01期

关键词：

FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; BARTHEL INDEX; NEUROLOGICAL DISABILITY;

D O I：

10.3109/09638289509166622

中图分类号：

R49 [康复医学];

学科分类号：

100215 ;

摘要：

The majority of measurement scales used to evaluate outcome in rehabilitation are ordinal in nature and consequently statistically valid assessments of change are difficult to make. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) can be weighted to possess interval properties, potentially allowing more accurate analysis of change. In this study the FIM was compared to the Barthel Index (BI) to determine its validity, reliability and ease of use in two groups of 25 patients undergoing neurorehabilitation. The FIM was considered to be more valid than the BI, and equally reliable in the assessment of disability. When the two disability scores were compared using subjective and objective assessment the agreement between them was comparable, although neither was high.

引用

页码：10 / 14

页数：5

共 17 条

[1]

Andrich D., 1988, RASCH MODELS MEASURE

[2]

APPLEGATE WB, 1990, NEW ENGL J MED, V322, P1207

[3] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].

BLAND, JM ;

ALTMAN, DG .

LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310

[4]

Collin C, 1988, Int Disabil Stud, V10, P61

[5]

FISHER AG, 1993, IN PRESS INT J ED RE

[6]

Granger C. V., 1986, TOP GERIATR REHABIL, V1, P59, DOI DOI 10.1097/00013614-198604000-00007

[7]

GRESHAM GE, 1988, ARCH PHYSICAL MED RE, V61, P355

[8]

HAMILTON B B, 1991, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, V72, P790

[9]

Hamilton BB, 1987, REHABILITATION OUTCO, P137

[10]

Keith R A, 1987, Adv Clin Rehabil, V1, P6

← 1 2 →