PATIENT-CONTROLLED EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN LABOR - VARYING BOLUS DOSE AND LOCKOUT INTERVAL

被引:58
作者
GAMBLING, DR
HUBER, CJ
BERKOWITZ, J
HOWELL, P
SWENERTON, JE
ROSS, PLE
CROCHETIERE, CT
PAVY, TJG
机构
[1] UNIV BRITISH COLUMBIA,DIV OBSTET ANAESTHESIA,VANCOUVER V6T 1W5,BC,CANADA
[2] GRACE HOSP,VANCOUVER,BC,CANADA
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE | 1993年 / 40卷 / 03期
关键词
ANESTHESIA; OBSTETRIC; ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES; EPIDURAL; ANESTHETICS LOCAL; BUPIVACAINE; ANALGESICS; FENTANYL; EQUIPMENT; PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA;
D O I
10.1007/BF03037032
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
This double-blind prospective study was designed to determine the best dose variables for patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and to compare bolus-only PCEA with continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during the first state of labour. Five groups of parturients self-administered 0.125% bupivacaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine and fentanyl 2.5 mug.ml-1 using PCA pumps programmed as follows. Group A, 2 ml bolus/10 min lockout interval (LI); Group B, 3 ml bolus/15 min LI; Group C, 4 ml bolus/20 min LI; Group D 6 ml bolus/30 min LI; Group E, 8 ml.hr-1 continuous infusion. Hourly assessments included: VAS scores for pain and satisfaction, sensory and motor block, bupivacaine and fentanyl consumption. Blood samples were collected at birth for maternal and fetal fentanyl concentrations. Data from 68 patients showed no differences among groups in pain relief or maternal satisfaction. Most patients received excellent analgesia and those requiring extra epidural supplements were evenly distributed across groups. There was higher consumption of bupivacaine and fentanyl in Group E than in any of the other four groups. bupivacaine mg, hr-1, mean (SD), 9.4 (2.7) in Group E vs 5.2 (1.7) in Groups A-D inclusive (P < 0.0001); fentanyl mug.hr-1, 19.6 (4.6) in Group E vs 12.6 (7.5) in Groups A-D inclusive (P < 0.05). Motor block was minimal, whereas sensory levels were higher at the 3- and 4-hour assessments in Groups D and E than in all other groups (P < 0.05). Plasma fentanyl concentrations were <0.5 ng.ml-1 in all sampks and no sequelae from fentanyl were observed, apart from mild pruritus. Bolus-only PCEA is a safe and effective alternative to CIEA during the first stage of labour irrespective of the initial dose variables selected.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 217
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
CELLENO D, 1991, REGION ANESTH, V15, P37
[2]  
EGAN KJ, 1990, PATIENT CONTROLLED A, P17
[3]  
FERRANTE FM, 1991, ANESTH ANALG, V73, P547
[4]  
GAMBLING DR, 1990, ANESTH ANALG, V70, P256
[5]   A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF PATIENT CONTROLLED EPIDURAL ANALGESIA (PCEA) AND CONTINUOUS INFUSION EPIDURAL ANALGESIA (CIEA) DURING LABOR [J].
GAMBLING, DR ;
YU, P ;
COLE, C ;
MCMORLAND, GH ;
PALMER, L .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1988, 35 (03) :249-254
[6]  
GOURLAY GK, 1988, ANESTH ANALG, V67, P329
[7]   FENTANYL-INDUCED VENTILATORY DEPRESSION - EFFECTS OF AGE [J].
HERTZKA, RE ;
GAUNTLETT, IS ;
FISHER, DM ;
SPELLMAN, MJ .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1989, 70 (02) :213-218
[8]   PATIENT-CONTROLLED EPIDURAL ANALGESIA DURING LABOR - A COMPARISON OF 3 SOLUTIONS WITH A CONTINUOUS INFUSION CONTROL [J].
LYSAK, SZ ;
EISENACH, JC ;
DOBSON, CE .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1990, 72 (01) :44-49
[9]   VARIABLES OF PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA .2. CONCURRENT INFUSION [J].
OWEN, H ;
SZEKELY, SM ;
PLUMMER, JL ;
CUSHNIE, JM ;
MATHER, LE .
ANAESTHESIA, 1989, 44 (01) :11-13