IS THE 2ND PHASE OF A BIPHASIC DEFIBRILLATION WAVE-FORM THE DEFIBRILLATING PHASE

被引:22
作者
HILLSLEY, RE
WALKER, RG
SWANSON, DK
ROLLINS, DL
WOLF, PD
SMITH, WM
IDEKER, RE
机构
[1] DUKE UNIV,MED CTR,DEPT PATHOL,DURHAM,NC 27710
[2] SCH ENGN,ENGN RES CTR EMERGING CARDIOVASC TECHNOL,DURHAM,NC
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 1993年 / 16卷 / 07期
关键词
VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION; DEFIBRILLATION; BIPHASIC SHOCKS; SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb01735.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Why some biphasic waveforms defibrillate with lower energies than monophasic waveforms of similar duration is unknown. One hypothesis is that the first phase of a biphasic waveform acts as a conditioning, hyperpolarizing prepulse to prepare for defibrillation by a second depolarizing phase. To test whether the second phase of u biphasic waveform is the defibrillating phase, three monophasic waveforms, an ascending ramp (A), a square wave (S), and a descending ramp (D), were compared to three biphasic waveforms with A, S, or D in the first phase (biphasic first phase) and three biphasic waveforms with A, S, or D in the second phase (biphasic second phase). Two defibrillation thresholds for each waveform were performed in 18 open chest pigs and mean defibrillation thresholds were compared. In nine pigs 16-msec monophasic and 16/16-msec biphasic waveforms were ranked by mean current and energy at defibrillation threshold. The ranks were the same for monophasic and biphasic second phase waveforms: for mean current A < S = D and for energy A < S < D. The ranks were different for the biphasic first phase waveforms: for mean current S < A = D and for energy S < A = D. Although ranks for the 16-msec monophasic waveforms matched those for the 16/16-msec biphasic second phase waveforms, the biphasic waveforms had hi-her mean currents and energies at defibrillation threshold. In nine pigs defibrillation thresholds for 6-msec monophasic and 6/6-msec biphasic waveforms were ranked. For mean current the ranks were monophasic: A < S = D; biphasic first phase: A = S = D; and biphasic second phase: S = D < A. For energy the ranks were monophasic: A = S < D; biphasic first phase: A = S = D; and biphasic second phase: S = D < A. Thus, ranks for the 6-msec monophasic waveforms differed from those for the 6/6-msec biphasic second phase waveforms. For 16/16-msec biphasic waveforms, less effective for defibrillation than corresponding 16-msec monophasic waveforms, these results support the hypothesis that the second phase of a biphasic waveform defibrillates since the defibrillation efficacy of a 16/16-msec biphasic waveform is related to the defibrillation efficacy of its second phase waveshape. However, for clinically useful 6/6-msec biphasic waveforms, more effective for defibrillation than 6-msec monophasic waveforms, the hypothesis is not supported because the ability of a 6/6-msec biphasic waveform to defibrillate is unrelated to the defibrillation efficacy of its second phase waveshape.
引用
收藏
页码:1401 / 1411
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
ANGELAKOS E. T., 1964, CARDIOLOGIA [BASEL], V44, P355, DOI 10.1159/000167922
[2]   A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED EVALUATION OF BIPHASIC VERSUS MONOPHASIC WAVEFORM PULSES ON DEFIBRILLATION EFFICACY IN HUMANS [J].
BARDY, GH ;
IVEY, TD ;
ALLEN, MD ;
JOHNSON, G ;
MEHRA, R ;
GREENE, HL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1989, 14 (03) :728-733
[3]   COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF MONOPHASIC AND BIPHASIC TRUNCATED EXPONENTIAL SHOCKS FOR NONTHORACOTOMY INTERNAL DEFIBRILLATION IN DOGS [J].
CHAPMAN, PD ;
VETTER, JW ;
SOUZA, JJ ;
TROUP, PJ ;
WETHERBEE, JN ;
HOFFMANN, RG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1988, 12 (03) :739-745
[4]   RESPONSE OF RELATIVELY REFRACTORY CANINE MYOCARDIUM TO MONOPHASIC AND BIPHASIC SHOCKS [J].
DAUBERT, JP ;
FRAZIER, DW ;
WOLF, PD ;
FRANZ, MR ;
SMITH, WM ;
IDEKER, RE .
CIRCULATION, 1991, 84 (06) :2522-2538
[5]   IMPROVED DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLDS WITH LARGE CONTOURED EPICARDIAL ELECTRODES AND BIPHASIC WAVE-FORMS [J].
DIXON, EG ;
TANG, ASL ;
WOLF, PD ;
MEADOR, JT ;
FINE, MJ ;
CALFEE, RV ;
IDEKER, RE .
CIRCULATION, 1987, 76 (05) :1176-1184
[6]   IMPROVED INTERNAL DEFIBRILLATION EFFICACY WITH A BIPHASIC WAVEFORM [J].
FAIN, ES ;
SWEENEY, MB ;
FRANZ, MR .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1989, 117 (02) :358-364
[7]   STRENGTH DURATION AND PROBABILITY OF SUCCESS CURVES FOR DEFIBRILLATION WITH BIPHASIC WAVE-FORMS [J].
FEESER, SA ;
TANG, ASL ;
KAVANAGH, KM ;
ROLLINS, DL ;
SMITH, WM ;
WOLF, PD ;
IDEKER, RE .
CIRCULATION, 1990, 82 (06) :2128-2141
[8]   SUPERIORITY OF BIPHASIC SHOCKS IN THE DEFIBRILLATION OF DOGS BY EPICARDIAL PATCHES AND CATHETER ELECTRODES [J].
FLAKER, GC ;
SCHUDER, JC ;
MCDANIEL, WC ;
STOECKLE, H ;
DBEIS, M .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1989, 118 (02) :288-291
[9]   IMPROVED SAFETY FACTOR FOR TRIPHASIC DEFIBRILLATOR WAVEFORMS [J].
JONES, JL ;
JONES, RE .
CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 1989, 64 (06) :1172-1177
[10]   IMPROVED CARDIAC CELL EXCITATION WITH SYMMETRICAL BIPHASIC DEFIBRILLATOR WAVEFORMS [J].
JONES, JL ;
JONES, RE ;
BALASKY, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 253 (06) :H1418-H1424