STOCHASTIC-ANALYSIS OF 2-PHASE FLOW IN POROUS-MEDIA .2. COMPARISON BETWEEN PERTURBATION AND MONTE-CARLO RESULTS

被引:16
作者
ABDIN, A
KALUARACHCHI, JJ
CHANG, CM
KEMBLOWSKI, MW
机构
[1] College of Engineering, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, 84322-8200, UT
关键词
STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS; MULTIPHASE FLOW; PERTURBATION; MONTE-CARLO RESULTS;
D O I
10.1007/BF00617532
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The first paper (Chang et al., 1995) described stochastic analysis of two-phase flow in a fully liquid-saturated system. In this paper, the results of Monte-Carlo simulations are compared with the closed-form expressions obtained using the perturbation approach. We present analytical solutions to the one-dimensional, steady-state oil-and-water flow equations. These solutions are subsequently used in the Monte-Carlo analysis to estimate the statistical properties of the key output processes. The comparison between the results of perturbation and Monte-Carlo approaches shows a good agreement between the two methods over a wide range ln kappa (kappa is the intrinsic permeability) variability with three different combinations of input stochastic processes of ln kappa and soil parameter Gamma. In particular, a good agreement was obtained for capillary and individual pressure variances and effective phase conductivities. The results showed that as the mean capillary pressure in the profile increased, the variance of capillary pressure increased while the variances of individual pressures decreased. Overall comparison between the two methods showed that the first-order perturbation theory can be successfully used to describe the effective behavior of large-scale, two-phase systems.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 280
页数:20
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Abriola L., Pinder G.F., A multiphase approach to the modeling of porous media contamination by organic compounds, 1. Equation development, Water Resour. Res., 21, pp. 11-18, (1985)
[2]  
Bakr A.A., Gelhar L.W., Gutjahr A.L., MacMillan J.R., Stochastic analysis of spatial variability in subsurface flows, 1. Comparison of one- and three-dimensional flows, Water Resour. Res., 14, 2, pp. 263-271, (1978)
[3]  
Bear J., Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media, (1972)
[4]  
Dagan G., Stochastic modeling of groundwater flow by unconditional and conditional probabilities: 2. The solute transport, Water Resour. Res., 18, 4, pp. 835-848, (1982)
[5]  
Essaid H.I., Hess K.M., Monte Carlo simulation of multiphase flow incorporating spatial variability of hydraulic properties, Ground Water, 31, 1, pp. 123-134, (1993)
[6]  
Freeze R.A., A stochastic-conceptual analysis of one-dimensional ground water flow in nonuniform homogeneous media, Water Resour. Res., 11, 5, pp. 725-741, (1975)
[7]  
Gelhar L.W., Stochastic subsurface hydrology-from theory to applications, Water Resour. Res., 22, 9, pp. 1355-1455, (1986)
[8]  
Hopmans J.W., Schukking H., Torfs P.J.J., Two-dimensional steady state unsaturated flow in heterogeneous soils with autocorrelated soil hydraulic properties, Water Resour. Res., 24, 12, pp. 2005-2017, (1988)
[9]  
Kaluarachchi J.J., Parker J.C., An efficient finite element method for modeling multiphase flow, Water Resour. Res., 25, 1, pp. 43-54, (1989)
[10]  
Kaluarachchi J.J., Parker J.C., Modeling of multicomponent organic chemical transport in three phase porous media, J. Contaminant Hydrol., 5, pp. 349-374, (1990)