THE INTRODUCTION OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY - AUDIT OF TRANSITION PERIOD WITH LATE FOLLOW-UP

The operative treatment of 356 consecutive patients with gallstone related disease who presented in the thirty months following the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was reviewed. A standard questionnaire, with emphasis on total hospital stay (including convalescence), late postoperative morbidity and time to return to work/full activity was sent to all patients. Two hundred and ninety-eight patients responded (83%). The median duration of follow-up was 19 months, (range 6-36 months). Patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy spent significantly less time in hospital post-operatively (median 3 days, interquartile range 2-4) than either those who required conversion to open cholecystectomy (median 7.5 days, interquartile range 5.5-10) or those who had planned open cholecystectomy (median 9.5 days, interquartile range 5-13), (p < 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis). Planned gall bladder extraction through the umbilical port site was associated with a significantly higher probability of wound infection compared with extraction through the epigastric port site (chi(2) = 4.977, P < 0.05). The median time to return to work/full activity was significantly shorter after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (median 21 days, interquartile range 14-42), than after open cholecystectomy (median 42 days, interquartile range 21-60) or following conversion to open cholecystectomy (median 56 days, interquartile range 35-60). We conclude that laparoscopic cholecystectomy requires a significantly shorter hospitalisation than open cholecystectomy and facilitates early return to work/full activity.