REPRODUCTION IN TURKEY HENS AS INFLUENCED BY PRE-BREEDER AND BREEDER PROTEIN INTAKE AND ENVIRONMENT

被引:23
作者
CHERMS, FL
STOLLER, MG
MACILRAITH, JJ
HALLORAN, HR
机构
[1] NICHOLAS TURKEY BREEDING FARMS INC, SONOMA, CA 95476 USA
[2] HALLORAN RES FARM INC, MODESTO, CA 95351 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3382/ps.0551678
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
June hatched female turkeys of an egg laying strain were subjected to 2 protein levels, either 15.6 or 18.5% protein, and 2 environmental regimes, either a natural day (E1) or a 6 h day of 5.4 1x (E2) in a 2 .times. 2 factorial design during the prebreeder period of 20-32 wk. Birds of each treatment were randomized into 4 breeder treatments when lit at 32 wk. Breeder performance traits were compared where hens were fed either 35 or 50 g of protein/hen per day on either a 12 h day with 53.8 1x (E4) or a minimum 14 h day with a minimum intensity of 150 1x (E3). Prebreeder treatment significantly influenced body weight at lighting where hens reared on 15.6% protein and a 6 h day were the lightest while those on the 18.5% protein and a natural day were the heaviest. By week 35 these differences had disappeared. Performance traits of age at 1st egg, egg production, hatchability, broodiness, and egg weight were not affected by the nutritional regimes studied during either the prebreeder or breeder phase. Significant environmental influences existed for age at 1st egg, egg production, broodiness, hatchability and body weight. The E2/E4 regime significantly increased the age at 1st egg over the other 3 environmental combinations. Egg production was significantly reduced by the E2/E4 treatment when compared to E1/E4 and E2/E3. Broodiness was adversely affected by both the E4 and the E2/E4 regimes. Hatchability was significantly higher with the E4 environment when compared to E3. In the last weeks of the 26 wk production period, hens on the E3 regime were heavier than those on the E4.
引用
收藏
页码:1678 / 1690
页数:13
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   INFLUENCE OF LENGTH OF DAY ON REPRODUCTION IN TURKEY HENS [J].
ASMUNDSON, VS ;
MOSES, BD .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 1950, 29 (01) :34-41
[2]   INFLUENCE OF LIGHT INTENSITY ON OVULATION IN TURKEYS [J].
ASMUNDSON, VS ;
LORENZ, FW ;
MOSES, BD .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 1946, 25 (04) :346-354
[3]  
ATKINSON RL, 1973, 1972 1973 TEX TURK I, P25
[4]  
Garland F.W., 1961, POULTRY SCI, V40, P1406
[5]   COMPARISON OF SEVERAL TREATMENTS ON TERMINATING BROODINESS IN BROAD BREASTED BRONZE TURKEYS [J].
HALLER, RW ;
CHERMS, FL .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 1961, 40 (01) :155-&
[6]   NUTRITIONAL INVESTIGATIONS WITH TURKEY HENS .1. QUANTITATIVE REQUIREMENT FOR PROTEIN [J].
JENSEN, LS ;
MCGINNIS, J .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 1961, 40 (02) :288-&
[7]   REPRODUCTION OF TURKEYS AS AFFECTED BY AGE AT LIGHTING AND LIGHT INTENSITY [J].
MCCARTNE.MG .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 1971, 50 (02) :661-&
[8]   PROTEIN REQUIREMENTS OF TURKEY BREEDER HENS [J].
MINEAR, LR ;
MILLER, DL ;
BALLOUN, SL .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 1972, 51 (06) :2040-2043
[9]   LIGHT-INTENSITY AND REPRODUCTION OF TURKEY HENS [J].
NESTOR, KE ;
BROWN, KI .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 1972, 51 (01) :117-&
[10]   EFFECT OF RESTRICTING LIGHT DURING ADOLESCENT PERIOD ON REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE IN TURKEYS SUBSEQUENTLY EXPOSED TO A 12-, 14-, AND 20-HOUR DAY [J].
OGASAWARA, FX ;
WILSON, WO ;
ASMUNDSON, VS .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 1962, 41 (06) :1858-&