PREDICTING STROKE INPATIENT REHABILITATION OUTCOME USING A CLASSIFICATION TREE APPROACH

被引:60
作者
FALCONER, JA
NAUGHTON, BJ
DUNLOP, DD
ROTH, EJ
STRASSER, DC
SINACORE, JM
机构
[1] EMORY UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT REHABIL MED,ATLANTA,GA 30322
[2] NORTHWESTERN UNIV,SCH MED,DIV GERIATR,CHICAGO,IL 60611
[3] NORTHWESTERN UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT PHYS MED & REHABIL,CHICAGO,IL 60611
[4] NORTHWESTERN UNIV,SCH MED,MULTIPURPOSE ARTHRITIS & MUSCULOSKELETAL DIS CTR,CHICAGO,IL 60611
[5] NORTHWESTERN UNIV,CTR HLTH SERV & POLICY RES,EVANSTON,IL 60201
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 1994年 / 75卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0003-9993(94)90182-1
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
A classification tree, a nonparametric statistical analysis, was used to develop decision rules to predict a favorable inpatient stroke rehabilitation outcome. Descriptive and functional status data collected on admission from 225 patients were the predictor variables. Favorable outcome was defined as having met three criteria: discharged to community, survival greater than 3 months postdischarge, and no more than minimal physical assistance required in functional activities on discharge. The classification tree correctly classified 88% of the sample using only four of the predictor variables (level of independence in Toilet Management, Bladder Management, and Toilet Transfer, and adequacy of Financial Resources). The cross validation error rate was 18%. The advantages of the classification tree approach over parametric methods are that it is desirable for ordinal data, it readily identifies the interactions among predictor variables, the results are easily communicated, and it provides additional insights into the factors that predict outcome. © 1994.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 625
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, TOP GERIATR REHABIL, DOI DOI 10.1097/00013614-198604000-00007
[2]  
Breiman L, 2017, CLASSIFICATION REGRE, P368, DOI 10.1201/9781315139470
[3]   DISABILITY AND USE OF REHABILITATION SERVICES FOLLOWING STROKE IN ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA, 1975-1979 [J].
DOMBOVY, ML ;
BASFORD, JR ;
WHISNANT, JP ;
BERGSTRALH, EJ .
STROKE, 1987, 18 (05) :830-836
[4]  
EVANS RL, 1991, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V72, P685
[5]  
Falconer J A, 1993, QRB Qual Rev Bull, V19, P8
[6]  
HAMILTON BB, 1987, REHABILITATION OUTCO
[7]   PREDICTION OF FUNCTION AFTER STROKE - A CRITICAL-REVIEW [J].
JONGBLOED, L .
STROKE, 1986, 17 (04) :765-776
[8]   PREDICTING LONG-TERM OUTCOME AMONG POST-REHABILITATION STROKE PATIENTS [J].
OSBERG, JS ;
DEJONG, G ;
HALEY, SM ;
SEWARD, ML ;
MCGINNIS, GE ;
GERMAINE, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1988, 67 (03) :94-103
[9]   CHARACTERISTICS OF COST OUTLIERS WHO DID NOT BENEFIT FROM STROKE REHABILITATION [J].
OSBERG, JS ;
HALEY, SM ;
MCGINNIS, GE ;
DEJONG, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1990, 69 (03) :117-125
[10]   EFFICIENCY, EFFECTIVENESS, AND DURATION OF STROKE REHABILITATION [J].
SHAH, S ;
VANCLAY, F ;
COOPER, B .
STROKE, 1990, 21 (02) :241-246