SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION AND ASSESSMENT OF HABITAT ABUNDANCE RELATIONSHIPS IN LITTORAL-ZONE FISH

被引:25
作者
HINCH, SG
SOMERS, KM
COLLINS, NC
机构
[1] ONTARIO MINIST ENVIRONM,WATER RESOURCES BRANCH,LIMNOL SECT,DORSET P0A 1E0,ON,CANADA
[2] UNIV TORONTO,ERINDALE COLL,MISSISSAUGA L5L 1C6,ONTARIO,CANADA
[3] UNIV TORONTO,DEPT ZOOL,MISSISSAUGA L5L 1C6,ON,CANADA
[4] UNIV TORONTO,DEPT ZOOL,TORONTO M5S 1A1,ONTARIO,CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1139/f94-070
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Spatial autocorrelation, wherein intersite similarity is correlated with distance between sites, is a characteristic of most ecological studies spanning a large environmental range. If data are spatially autocorrelated, classical statistical techniques provide biased estimates of relationships between species attributes and environmental variables. We examined abundances of seven littoral fishes in 25 lakes that varied substantially in morphometry, chemistry, and elevation across central Ontario. Weak correlations were observed between abundances of particular species and environmental variables before correcting for spatial autocorrelation, and we hypothesized that correlations reflected species' habitat preferences. However, spatial autocorrelation existed in the abiotic and fish abundance datasets. Once large-scale geographic patterns (spatial autocorrelation) were removed using partial Mantel tests, correlations changed within and between datasets. A strong relationship emerged between abundances and lake elevation. By comparing patterns within geographically corrected data with those without correction, we identified particular species that exhibited spatially autocorrelated abundances. The geographic direction of spatial autocorrelation provided additional insights into environmental factors also correlating with species abundance. We recommend that ecologists examine both geographically corrected and noncorrected data when developing hypotheses to explain regional variation in species abundance.
引用
收藏
页码:701 / 712
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[2]  
Bivand R, 1980, QUAESTIONES GEOGRAPH, V6, P5
[3]   PARTIALLING OUT THE SPATIAL COMPONENT OF ECOLOGICAL VARIATION [J].
BORCARD, D ;
LEGENDRE, P ;
DRAPEAU, P .
ECOLOGY, 1992, 73 (03) :1045-1055
[4]  
Cliff A, 1981, SPATIAL PROCESSES MO, P266
[5]  
COLBY PJ, 1987, CAN J FISH AQUAT SCI, V44, P104
[6]  
DOLMAN WB, 1990, T AM FISH SOC, V119, P511, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1990)119<0511:COTRIR>2.3.CO
[7]  
2
[8]  
DUARTE CM, 1991, COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF ECOSYSTEMS, P301
[9]  
Gauch Jr H.G., 1982, MULTIVARIATE ANAL CO
[10]  
GOWER JC, 1966, BIOMETRIKA, V53, P325, DOI 10.2307/2333639