A NEW TOOL TO INTERPRET MAGNITUDE AND DURATION OF FISH HABITAT VARIATIONS

被引:77
作者
CAPRA, H
BREIL, P
SOUCHON, Y
机构
[1] Laboratory of Quantitative Hydroecology, Division of Biology of Aquatic Ecosystems, CEMAGREF, Lyon, 69336
[2] Hydrology and Hydraulics Division, CEMAGREF, Lyon, 69336
[3] Laboratory of Quantitative Hydroecology, Division of Biology of Aquatic Ecosystems, CEMAGREF, Lyon, 69336
来源
REGULATED RIVERS-RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT | 1995年 / 10卷 / 2-4期
关键词
FISH HABITAT VARIATIONS; HABITAT SIMULATIONS; WEIGHTED USABLE AREA;
D O I
10.1002/rrr.3450100221
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The main result of habitat simulation procedures is a static relationship between an index of potential habitat, e.g. weighted usable area (WUA), versus discharge in a study reach representative of a stream. A new methodology was developed to analyse the timing and magnitude of physical habitat variations. Three options are presented: (i) the habitat time series; (ii) the habitat duration curves; and (iii) the continuous under threshold habitat duration curves. The last option is a new procedure to interpret habitat chronicles. It determines continuous durations during which the total WUA in a study reach was lower than a given threshold. The assumption according to which some durations/threshold values could represent limiting events for fish population dynamics is illustrated with surveys of two wild brown trout populations. The relationship between spawning habitat conditions and the relative density of 0+ the year after was studied. A continuous duration of more than 20 days with spawning habitat conditions lower than 80% of the optimum conditions seemed to limit the number of 0+ trout. This procedure is presented as a tool to interpret natural discharge time series for management.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 289
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Amoros C., Petts G.E., Hydrosystèmes Fluviaux, (1993)
[2]  
Baume J.P., Poirson M., Modélisation numérique d'un écoulement permanent dans un réseau hydraulique maillé à surface libre, en régime fluvial, La Houille blanche, 1, 2, pp. 95-100, (1984)
[3]  
Bjornn T.C., Reiser D.W., Habitat requirements of Salmonids in streams, Influences of Forest and Rangeland Management on Salmonid Fishes and their Habitats, pp. 83-138, (1991)
[4]  
Bovee K.D., Instream Flow Information Paper no 12, (1982)
[5]  
Bovee K.D., (1988)
[6]  
Bovee K.D., Milhous R.T., Hydraulic Simulation in Instream Flow Studies: Theory and Techniques, (1978)
[7]  
Carle F.L., Strub M.R., Biometrics, 34, pp. 621-630, (1978)
[8]  
Cheslak E.F., Jacobson A.S., Rivers, 1, pp. 264-288, (1990)
[9]  
Conder A.L., Annear T.C., Test of weighted usable area estimates derived from a PHABSIM model for instream flow studies on trout streams, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 7, pp. 339-350, (1987)
[10]  
Detenbeck N.E., Devore P.W., Nieme G.J., Lima A., Recovery of temperate‐stream fish communities from disturbance: a review of case studies and synthesis of theory, Environ. Manage., 16, pp. 33-53, (1992)