PRODUCTION TRAITS OF HOLSTEIN CATTLE - ESTIMATION OF NONADDITIVE GENETIC VARIANCE-COMPONENTS AND INBREEDING DEPRESSION

被引:62
作者
MIGLIOR, F
BURNSIDE, EB
KENNEDY, BW
机构
[1] Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
DAIRY CATTLE; PRODUCTION TRAITS; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; NONADDITIVE GENETIC VARIANCES;
D O I
10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76735-2
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Additive, dominance, and additive by additive components of genetic variance and inbreeding depression were estimated for production traits from a group of daughters of young sires from the Canadian Holstein population. First lactations of 92,838 cows were analyzed. Three sire and dam models (additive, additive plus dominance, additive plus dominance plus additive by additive genetic effects), all including regression of the trait on inbreeding coefficient of the cow, were used to estimate the effect of inbreeding on production traits. For all production traits, heritability in the narrow sense was overestimated with the simplest model, in which only the additive effect was fitted. Estimates of dominance variance were low for all traits, .9 to 3%. Additive by additive components were low for milk, 2.8%, and fat yield, 2.8%, but higher for protein yield, 6.8%, and for fat, 9%, and protein percentages, 8.9%. Estimates of inbreeding depression for the five traits were similar across all models (-25, -.9, and -.8 kg; .05% and .05% per 1% increase in inbreeding for milk, fat, and protein production and fat and protein percentages, respectively). More accurate estimates of additive effects might be obtained with the inclusion of nonadditive effects for genetic evaluation. If the estimation of inbreeding depression is the only objective, simple models and small random samples of the population may be adequate.
引用
收藏
页码:1174 / 1180
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Allaire F.R., Henderson C.R., Inbreeding within an artificially bred dairy cattle population, J. Dairy Sci., 48, (1965)
[2]  
Casanova L., Hagger C., Kuenzi N., Schnee-berger M., Inbreeding in Swiss Braunvieh and its influence on breeding values predicted from a repeatability animal model, J. Dairy Sci., 75, (1992)
[3]  
deBoer I.J.M., Van Arendonk J.A.M., Prediction of additive and dominance effects in selected or unselected populations with inbreeding, Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 84, (1992)
[4]  
DeStefano A.L., Hoeschele I., Utilization of dominance variance through mate allocation strategies, Journal of Dairy Science, 75, (1992)
[5]  
Fuerst C., Solkner J., Additive and nonadditive genetic variances for milk production, fertility,and lifetime performance traits in purebred and crossbred cattle populations, J. Dairy Sci., 77, (1994)
[6]  
Henderson C.R., A simple method for computing the inverse of a numerator relationship matrix used in the prediction of breeding values, Biometrics, 32, (1976)
[7]  
Hodges J., Tannen L., McGillivray B.J., Hiley P.G., Ellis S., Inbreeding levels and their effect on milk, fat and calving interval in Holstein-Friesian cows, Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 59, (1979)
[8]  
Hoeschele I., VanRaden P.M., Rapid inversion of dominance relationship matrices for noninbred populations by including sire-dam subclass effects, J. Dairy Sci., 74, (1991)
[9]  
Hudson G.F.S., Van Vleck L.D., Inbreeding of artificially bred dairy cattle in the northeastern United States, J. Dairy Sci., 67, (1984)
[10]  
Laben R.C., Herman H.A., Genetic factors affecting milk production in a selected Holstein-Friesian herd, 459, (1950)