IS BENTSEN,LLOYD UNCONSTITUTIONAL

被引：19

作者：

PAULSEN, MS

机构：

来源：

STANFORD LAW REVIEW | 1994年 / 46卷 / 04期

关键词：

D O I：

10.2307/1229096

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

The answer, Professor Paulsen argues, is yes, in the sense that Bentsen's appointment as Secretary of the Treasury is a flagrant and irremediable violation of the Constitution's ''Emoluments Clause.'' How could such an obvious violation of the Constitution be so widely ignored, or worse, tolerated? Professor Paulsen speculates as to the lessons the Lloyd Bentsen affair teaches about whether the Constitution really should be taken seriously.

引用

页码：907 / 918

页数：12

共 15 条

[1]

BORK RH, 1990, TEMPTING AM POLITICA, P269

[2]

CALABRESI SG, 1994, IN PRESS CORNELL L R, V79

[3]

CANNON L, 1987, WASH POST 0627, pA9

[4]

COLBORN PP, 1993, COMMUNICATION 0727

[5]

DETOQUEVILLE A, 1963, DEMOCRACY AM, P103

[6]

Holmes Oliver W., 1897, HARVARD LAW REV, V10, P461

[7]

Holmes Oliver Wendell, 1897, HARV L REV, V10, P457

[8]

JEFFERSON T, 1910, COMMUNICATION 0920

[9]

KOLBERT E, 1992, NY TIMES 0331, pA17

[10] ORDER AND LAW - ARGUING THE REAGAN REVOLUTION - A FIRSTHAND ACCOUNT - FRIED,C [J].

MCGINNIS, JO .

STANFORD LAW REVIEW, 1992, 44 (03) :799-814

← 1 2 →