EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY FOR STONES IN MIDDLE 3RD OF URETER (OVERLYING PELVIC BONE)

Objective. To compare the results of using Dornier HM3 and Medstone STS lithotriptors to treat a ureteral stone overlying the pelvic bone (mid third of ureter) requiring the patient to be in the prone position. Method. The ease of use with each lithotriptor was evaluated and a retrospective review of the results using a Dornier HM3 in 53 patients and a Medstone STS in 143 patients was performed. The chi-square test was used to determine statistical difference. Results. With single stones, the re-treatment rate, the post-ESWL secondary procedure rate, and the stone-free rate were 6 percent, 13 percent, and 75 percent, respectively, with the Dornier, and 6 percent, 8 percent, and 80 percent, respectively, with the Medstone. There was no statistically significant difference between these outcome results (p > 0.05). Conclusion. The prone position was difficult to achieve with the Dornier HM3, while the Medstone STS, a tubeless lithotriptor, allowed easy positioning of the patient in the prone position on its flat table. Satisfactory results were achieved using either machine.