ORAL ONDANSETRON IN THE PREVENTION OF CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED EMESIS IN BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS

被引:30
作者
CLAVEL, M
BONNETERRE, J
DALLENS, H
PAILLARSE, JM
BONSROSSET
BREMOND
CAILLERES
CHOLLET
CORETTE
DREYFUS
DUTIN
FROGER
GOUDIER
GUIOCHET
KOHN
LAPLAIGE
LEBOURGEOIS
LEJEUNE
LEROL
MANDET
MARTY
MAYLEVIN
MELLE
MIGNOT
MORVAN
OBERLING
OLIVIER
PATRICOT
POUILLART
PREVOT
PUJADELAURAINE
RENAUD
RIMAILHO
ROMIEU
CELIGNY, S
SUZANNE
VEYRET
ZYLBERBERG
机构
[1] LABS GLAXO,DEPT MED,PARIS,FRANCE
[2] CTR OSCAR LAMBRET,F-59020 LILLE,FRANCE
[3] CTR LEON BERARD,F-69373 LYON,FRANCE
关键词
5HT(3) ANTAGONISTS; ANTIEMETICS; CYTOTOXIC-INDUCED EMESIS; RANDOMIZED TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/0959-8049(94)00369-G
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A multicentre randomised, double-blind parallel group study has been carried out in order to confirm the antiemetic efficacy of orally administered ondansetron. A total of 259 chemotherapy-naive breast cancer patients treated with a 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (FAC) or 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC) regimen were randomly assigned to ondansetron (OND) 8 mg tablet or alizapride (ALI) 150 mg intravenous (i.v.) injection, prior to chemotherapy. These treatments were then followed by OND 8 mg tablet or ALI 50 mg tablet, respectively, 8 to 12 h later. Oral treatment was then continued twice a day over 3-5 days. The number of emetic episodes (EE = vomits + retches) and the grade of nausea were recorded; quality of life was assessed using a specific questionnaire. Of the 254 patients analysed for efficacy, complete or major control (success: 0-2 EE) over the 24 h following start of chemotherapy was obtained in 81% of the OND group compared with 47% of the ALI group (P < 0.001). A significant difference in favour of OND was also observed for nausea (P < 0.0001). For on days 2 to 4 emesis, the arm containing OND was superior to that with ALI (worst day analysis): 77% success versus 63% (P < 0.002). The overall control of emesis (from day 1 to day 4) was better with OND (64% patients success in the OND group versus 41% in the ALI group; P < 0.0001). At the end of the study the number of patients wishing to receive the same anti-emetic treatment for their next course was 83% for OND compared with 54% for ALI (P < 0.0001). In terms of quality of life in relation to emesis phenomena, OND was significantly superior to ALI (P = 0.04). Both treatments were well tolerated. In the prevention of the prolonged emesis induced by FAC/FEC-type emetogenic chemotherapy, orally administered OND was superior to ALI, given as an i.v. injection and followed by tablets.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 19
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   EFFICACY OF ORAL ONDANSETRON IN THE PREVENTION OF EMESIS IN OUTPATIENTS RECEIVING CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE-BASED CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
BECK, TM ;
CIOCIOLA, AA ;
JONES, SE ;
HARVEY, WH ;
TCHEKMEDYIAN, NS ;
CHANG, A ;
GALVIN, D ;
HART, NE .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 118 (06) :407-413
[2]   A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF ONDANSETRON AND METOCLOPRAMIDE IN THE PROPHYLAXIS OF EMESIS INDUCED BY CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, FLUOROURACIL, AND DOXORUBICIN OR EPIRUBICIN CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
BONNETERRE, J ;
CHEVALLIER, B ;
METZ, R ;
FARGEOT, P ;
PUJADELAURAINE, E ;
SPIELMANN, M ;
TUBIANAHULIN, M ;
PAES, D ;
BONS, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1990, 8 (06) :1063-1069
[3]  
CUPISOL D, 1988, NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHE, P911
[4]  
DEPIERRE A, 1991, 3RD INT C NEOADJ CHE, P23
[5]  
Dicato M A, 1992, Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), V4, P275, DOI 10.1016/S0936-6555(05)81098-2
[6]  
GRALLA R, 1988, CLINICIAN, V6, P26
[7]  
HAROUSSEAU JL, 1991, 3RD INT C NEOADJ CHE, P9
[8]  
HIRSCH JD, 1992, P ASCO, V11, P1368
[9]  
HIRSCH JD, 1992, P ASCO, V11, P393
[10]   DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF THE ANTIEMETIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ONDANSETRON AND METOCLOPRAMIDE IN ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS TREATED WITH EPIRUBICIN AND CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE [J].
MARSCHNER, NW ;
ADLER, M ;
NAGEL, GA ;
CHRISTMANN, D ;
FENZL, E ;
UPADHYAYA, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1991, 27 (09) :1137-1140