INTERACTIONS BETWEEN GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE-WATER IN A VIRGINIA COASTAL-PLAIN WATERSHED .1. HYDROLOGICAL FLOWPATHS

被引:22
作者
ESHLEMAN, KN
POLLARD, JS
OBRIEN, AK
机构
[1] Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
[2] US Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Reston, Virginia
关键词
HYDROLOGICAL FLOWPATHS; SURFACE WATER-GROUNDWATER INTERACTIONS; VIRGINIA COASTAL PLAIN;
D O I
10.1002/hyp.3360080503
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
A field study of surface water and groundwater interactions during baseflow and stormflow conditions was performed at the Reedy Creek watershed in the Virginia Coastal Plain. Three estimates of the average saturated hydraulic conductivity (K(s)) of the unconfined aquifer were in reasonable agreement (ranging from 0.0033 to 0.010 cm/s), indicating that baseflow in the creek is entirely from the drainage of shallow groundwater from the relatively thin (1-6 m thick) unconfined aquifer. This relatively permeable surficial aquifer was found to be underlain by dark, olive grey, clay-silt and diatomaceous Miocene deposits of low permeability known as the Calvert Formation, which is believed to function as a confining bed in the area. A chemical hydrograph separation technique was used to resolve the contributions of 'old' (pre-event) and 'new' (event) water to stormflow. Results from a major rainstorm indicated that old water dominated the stormflow response of the watershed, although the new water contribution approached 40% at the hydrograph peak. Stormflow at Reedy Creek appears to result from saturation overland flow from variable source areas which include the stream channels and a significant part of the riparian wetland area. This response appears to be attributable to the transient dynamics of the shallow groundwater flow system and to the formation of localized groundwater mounds which raise the water-table to the wetland surface.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 410
页数:22
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Beven K., The hydrological response of headwater and sideslope areas, Hydrol. Sci. Bull., 23, pp. 419-437, (1978)
[2]  
Bottomley D.J., Craig D., Johnson L.M., Oxygen‐18 studies of snowmelt runoff in a small Precambrian shield watershed: implications for streamwater acidification in acid‐sensitive terrain, J. Hydrol., 88, pp. 213-234, (1986)
[3]  
Bricker O.P., Geochemical investigations of selected eastern United States watersheds affected by acid deposition, Journal of the Geological Society, 143, pp. 621-626, (1986)
[4]  
Freeze R.A., Streamflow generation, Reviews of Geophysics, 12, pp. 627-747, (1974)
[5]  
Freeze R.A., Cherry J.A., Groundwater, (1979)
[6]  
Gillham R.W., The effect of the capillary fringe on water‐table response, J. Hydrol., 67, pp. 307-324, (1984)
[7]  
Hall C.H., (1993)
[8]  
Hvorslev M.J., (1951)
[9]  
Kaufmann P.R., Et al., Chemical characteristics of streams in the Mid‐Atlantic and Southeastern United States, Vol. I: population descriptions and physico‐chemical relationships, EPA/600/3‐88/021a, (1988)
[10]  
Kennedy V.C., Kendall G., Zellweger G.W., Wyerman T.A., Avanzino R.J., Determination of the components of stormflow using water chemistry and environmental isotopes, Mattole River basin, California, J. Hydrol., 84, pp. 107-140, (1986)