RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SURFACE-AREA FOR ADHESION AND TENSILE BOND STRENGTH - EVALUATION OF A MICRO-TENSILE BOND TEST

被引:618
作者
SANO, H
SHONO, T
SONODA, H
TAKATSU, T
CIUCCHI, B
CARVALHO, R
PASHLEY, DH
机构
[1] TOKYO MED & DENT UNIV,DEPT OPERAT DENT,TOKYO 113,JAPAN
[2] UNIV GENEVA,DEPT RESTORAT DENT & ENDODONT,GENEVA,SWITZERLAND
[3] BAURU SCH DENT,DEPT OPERAT DENT,SAO PAULO,BRAZIL
[4] MED COLL GEORGIA,DEPT ORAL BIOL PHYSIOL,AUGUSTA,GA 30912
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to test the null hypothesis that there is no relationship between the bonded surface area of dentin and the tensile strength of adhesive materials. Methods. The enamel was removed from the occlusal surface of extracted human third molars, and the entire flat surface was covered with resin composite bonded to the dentin to form a flat resin composite crown. Twenty-four hours later, the bonded specimens were sectioned parallel to the long axis of the tooth into 10-20 thin sections whose upper part was composed of resin composite with the lower half being dentin. These small sections were trimmed using a high speed diamond bur into an hourglass shape with the narrowest portion at the bonded interface. Surface area was varied by altering the specimen thickness and width. Tensile bond strength was measured using custom-made grips in a universal testing machine. Results. Tensile bond strength was inversely related to bonded surface area. At surface areas below 0.4 mm(2), the tensile bond strengths were about 55 MPa for Clearfil Liner Bond 2 (Kuraray Co., Ltd.), 38 MPa for Scotchbond MP (3M Dental Products), and 20 MPa for Vitremer (3M Dental Products). At these small surface areas all of the bond failures were adhesive in nature. Significance. This new method permits measurement of high bond strengths without cohesive failure of dentin. It also permits multiple measurements to be made within a single tooth.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 240
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   TENSILE STRENGTH AND MODULUS OF ELASTICITY OF TOOTH STRUCTURE AND SEVERAL RESTORATIVE MATERIALS [J].
BOWEN, RL ;
RODRIGUEZ, MS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1962, 64 (03) :378-&
[2]   EARLY TENSILE BOND STRENGTHS OF SEVERAL ENAMEL AND DENTIN BONDING SYSTEMS [J].
BURROW, MF ;
TAGAMI, J ;
NEGISHI, T ;
NIKAIDO, T ;
HOSODA, H .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1994, 73 (02) :522-528
[3]  
Burrow Michael F., 1993, Bulletin of Tokyo Medical and Dental University, V40, P173
[4]  
CAUSTON BE, 1984, BR DENT J, V167, P308
[5]  
Griffith A.A., 1920, PHILOS T R SOC LON A, V221, P168
[6]  
Kiyomura M., 1987, J JPN DENT MATER, V6, P860
[7]  
LEHMAN ML, 1964, J DENT RES, V46, P197
[8]   INFLUENCE OF CALCIUM-CONCENTRATION ON THE DENTIN WETTABILITY BY AN ADHESIVE [J].
PANIGHI, M ;
GSELL, C .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1992, 26 (08) :1081-1089
[9]   DENTIN THICKNESS, HARDNESS, AND CA-CONCENTRATION VS BOND STRENGTH OF DENTIN ADHESIVES [J].
PERINKA, L ;
SANO, H ;
HOSODA, H .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1992, 8 (04) :229-233
[10]  
Prati C, 1992, Am J Dent, V5, P33