CONTROLLED EVALUATION OF 3 DRUG-COMBINATION REGIMENS VERSUS FLUOROURACIL ALONE FOR THE THERAPY OF ADVANCED GASTRIC-CANCER

被引:116
作者
CULLINAN, SA
MOERTEL, CG
WIEAND, HS
OCONNELL, MJ
POON, MA
KROOK, JE
MAILLIARD, JA
TSCHETTER, LK
机构
[1] MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
[2] ILLINOIS ONCOL RES ASSOC,COMMUNITY CLIN ONCOL PROGRAM,PEORIA,IL
[3] ALLAN BLAIR MEM CLIN,SASKATCHEWAN CANC FDN,REGINA,SK,CANADA
[4] DULUTH COMMUNITY CLIN ONCOL PROGRAM,DULUTH,MN
[5] SIOUX COMMUNITY CANC CONSORTIUM,SIOUX FALLS,SD
[6] UNIV NEBRASKA MED CTR & ASSOCIATES,CREIGHTON UNIV,NEBRASKA ONCOL GRP,OMAHA,NE
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1994.12.2.412
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin, and methyl lomustine (CCNU) (FAMe), 5-FU, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (FAP), and FAMe alternating with triazinate (TZT) when compared with a standard therapy of 5-FU alone in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients and Methods: Two hundred fifty-two eligible patients selected for study had proven locally unresectable and/or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. The majority had nonmeasurable disease. They were randomly assigned to receive one of the three drug combination regimens or to 5-FU alone administered by rapid injection in 5-day course. Survival was the primary study end point. Results: None of the three drug combinations showed a significant advantage over 5-FU alone in improved performance score, weight gain, or patient survival. Each of the three combinations was more toxic than 5-FU alone. Conclusion: FAMe, FAP, or FAMe alternating with TZT cannot be recommended for the therapy of advanced gastric carcinoma. Therapy of this disease should remain an experimental endeavor. It would seem reasonable to prove the value of any new treatment approach by a randomized comparison to simple therapy with 5-FU alone.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 416
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] A PHASE-II STUDY OF CISPLATIN IN ADVANCED GASTRIC-CANCER
    BEER, M
    COCCONI, G
    CECI, G
    VARINI, M
    CAVALLI, F
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER & CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1983, 19 (06): : 717 - 720
  • [2] BRUCKNER HW, 1982, CANCER TREAT REP, V66, P1713
  • [3] COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
  • [4] A COMPARISON OF 3 CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC REGIMENS IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PANCREATIC AND GASTRIC-CARCINOMA - FLUOROURACIL VS FLUOROURACIL AND DOXORUBICIN VS FLUOROURACIL, DOXORUBICIN, AND MITOMYCIN
    CULLINAN, SA
    MOERTEL, CG
    FLEMING, TR
    RUBIN, JR
    KROOK, JE
    EVERSON, LK
    WINDSCHITL, HE
    TWITO, DI
    MARSCHKE, RF
    FOLEY, JF
    PFEIFLE, DM
    BARLOW, JF
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1985, 253 (14): : 2061 - 2067
  • [5] AN EASTERN COOPERATIVE ONCOLOGY GROUP EVALUATION OF COMBINATIONS OF METHYL-CCNU, MITOMYCIN-C, ADRIAMYCIN, AND 5-FLUOROURACIL IN ADVANCED MEASURABLE GASTRIC-CANCER (EST-2277)
    DOUGLASS, HO
    LAVIN, PT
    GOUDSMIT, A
    KLAASSEN, DJ
    PAUL, AR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1984, 2 (12) : 1372 - 1381
  • [6] FAMTX VERSUS ETOPOSIDE, DOXORUBICIN, AND CISPLATIN - A RANDOM ASSIGNMENT TRIAL IN GASTRIC-CANCER
    KELSEN, D
    ATIQ, OT
    SALTZ, L
    NIEDZWIECKI, D
    GINN, D
    CHAPMAN, D
    HEELAN, R
    LIGHTDALE, C
    VINCIGUERRA, V
    BRENNAN, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1992, 10 (04) : 541 - 548
  • [7] LACAVE AJ, 1983, AM J CLIN ONCOL-CANC, V6, P35
  • [8] LEICHMAN L, 1982, P AM ASSOC CANC RES, V23, P110
  • [9] ETOPOSIDE, DOXORUBICIN, AND CISPLATIN CHEMOTHERAPY FOR ADVANCED GASTRIC ADENOCARCINOMA - RESULTS OF A PHASE-II TRIAL
    LERNER, A
    GONIN, R
    STEELE, GD
    MAYER, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1992, 10 (04) : 536 - 540
  • [10] MANTEL N, 1959, J NATL CANCER I, V22, P719