OPTIMAL TRAJECTORIES FOR THE AEROASSISTED FLIGHT EXPERIMENT

被引:17
作者
MIELE, A
WANG, T
LEE, WY
ZHAO, ZG
机构
[1] Aero-Astronautics Group, Rice University, Houston, TX 77251-1892
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0094-5765(90)90116-3
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This paper deals with the determination of optimal trajectories for the aeroassisted flight experiment (AFE). The intent of this experiment is to simulate a GEO-to-LEO transfer, where GEO denotes a geosynchronous Earth orbit and LEO denotes a low Earth orbit. Specifically, the AFE spacecraft is released from the Space Shuttle and is accelerated by means of a solid rocket motor toward Earth, so as to achieve atmospheric entry conditions identical with those of a spacecraft returning from GEO. During the atmospheric pass, the angle of attack is kept constant, and the angle of bank is controlled in such a way that the following conditions are satisfied: (a) the atmospheric velocity depletion is such that, after exiting, the AFE spacecraft first ascends to a specified apogee and then descends to a specified perigee; and (b) the exit orbital plane is identical with the entry orbital plane. The final maneuver, not analyzed here, includes the rendezvous with and the capture by the Space Shuttle. In this paper, the trajectories of an AFE spacecraft are analyzed in a 3D space, employing the full system of 6 ODEs describing the atmospheric pass. The atmospheric entry conditions are given, and the atmospheric exit conditions are adjusted in such a way that requirements (a) and (b) are met, while simultaneously minimizing the total characteristic velocity, hence the propellant consumption required for orbital transfer. Two possible transfers are considered: indirect ascent (IA) to a 178 NM perigee via a 197 NM apogee; and direct ascent (DA) to a 178 NM apogee. For both transfers, two cases are investigated: (i) the bank angle is continuously variable; and (ii) the trajectory is divided into segments along which the bank angle is constant. For case (ii), the following subcases are studied: 2, 3, 4 and 5 segments; because the time duration of each segment is optimized, the above subcases involve 4, 6, 8 and 10 parameters, respectively. It is shown that the optimal trajectories of cases (i) and (ii) coalesce into a single trajectory: a two-subarc trajectory, with the bank angle constant in each subarc (bang-bang control). Specifically, the bank angle is near 180-degrees in the atmospheric entry phase (positive lift projection phase) and is near 0-degrees in the atmospheric exit phase (negative lift projection phase). It is also shown that, during the atmospheric pass, the peak values of the changes of the orbital inclination and the longitude of the ascending node are nearly zero; hence, the peak value of the wedge angle (angle between the instantaneous orbital plane and the initial orbital plane) is nearly zero. This means that the motion of the spacecraft is nearly planar in an inertial space.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 747
页数:13
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Miele, Zhao, Lee, Optimal trajectories for the aeroassisted flight experiment, Part 1, equations of motion in an Earth-fixed system, Aero-Astronautics Report No. 238, (1989)
[2]  
Miele, Zhao, Lee, Optimal trajectories for the aeroassisted flight experiment, Part 2, equations of motion in an inertial system, Aero-Astronautics Report No. 239, (1989)
[3]  
Miele, Wang, Lee, Zhao, Optimal trajectories for the aeroassisted flight experiment, Part 3, formulation, results, and analysis, Aero-Astronautics Report No. 242, (1989)
[4]  
Miele, Wang, Lee, Wang, Wu, Optimal trajectories for the aeroassisted flight experiment, Part 4, data, tables, and graphs, Aero-Astronautics Report No. 243, (1989)
[5]  
Walberg, A survey of aeroassisted orbital transfer, J. Spacecraft Rockets, 22, pp. 3-18, (1985)
[6]  
Mease, Vinh, Minimum fuel aeroassisted coplanar orbital transfer using lift modulation, J. Guidance Control Dynam., 8, pp. 134-141, (1985)
[7]  
Vinh, Hanson, Optimal aeroassisted return from high Earth orbit with plane change, Acta Astronautica, 12, pp. 11-25, (1985)
[8]  
Miele, Special Issue on Hypervelocity Flight, J. Astronaut. Sci., 36, pp. 1-197, (1988)
[9]  
Mease, Optimization of aeroassisted orbital transfer: current status, J. Astronaut. Sci., 36, pp. 7-34, (1988)
[10]  
Aeroassisted flight experiment: preliminary design document, (1986)