LESION DETECTION IN SIMULATED ELASTOGRAPHIC AND ECHOGRAPHIC IMAGES - A PSYCHOPHYSICAL STUDY

被引:28
作者
BELAID, N
CESPEDES, I
THIJSSEN, JM
OPHIR, J
机构
[1] UNIV NIJMEGEN HOSP,DEPT OPHTHALMOL,BIOPHYS LAB,6500 HB NIJMEGEN,NETHERLANDS
[2] UNIV TEXAS,SCH MED,DEPT RADIOL,ULTRASON LAB,HOUSTON,TX 77030
关键词
COMPARATIVE STUDY; ULTRASOUND; ELASTOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; HUMAN OBSERVER; IDEAL OBSERVER; STAIRCASE UP-DOWN; THRESHOLD; CONTRAST-DETAIL CURVE; LESION SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO;
D O I
10.1016/0301-5629(94)90048-5
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The image quality of two ultrasonic imaging techniques was studied: conventional echography and the recently introduced elastography. The image quality was assessed by estimating the detectability of disc-shaped lesions of various sizes and contrast levels. The study was designed to verify the hypothesis that elastograms could show lesions at a higher subjective and objective level of detectability than echograms of the same object contrast. This hypothesis was adopted because homogeneous elastograms can present a higher point signal-to-noise ratio than uniform echograms. Both elastograms and echograms were generated by two-dimensional (2D) simulations. The subjective assessment was performed by psychophysical experiments using the staircase up-down method. The threshold contrast of detection for both modalities was determined at different diameters of the disc-shaped lesion. These values were used to construct the contrast-detail curves for both techniques. For identical object contrasts, elastography was found to have significantly higher detectability at all lesion diameters considered. The contrast thresholds were also used for an objective evaluation with the lesion signal-to-noise ratio. The objective measure evaluated at the subjective threshold of detection for both modalities was not found to be identical, nor constant over the range of lesion diameters as expected.
引用
收藏
页码:877 / 891
页数:15
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] THE UP-AND-DOWN METHOD WITH SMALL SAMPLES
    BROWNLEE, KA
    HODGES, JL
    ROSENBLATT, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1953, 48 (262) : 262 - 277
  • [2] SPECKLE IN ULTRASOUND B-MODE SCANS
    BURCKHARDT, CB
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SONICS AND ULTRASONICS, 1978, 25 (01): : 1 - 6
  • [3] Burgess A. E., 1986, Proceedings of the SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, V626, P208, DOI 10.1117/12.975395
  • [4] EFFICIENCY OF HUMAN VISUAL SIGNAL DISCRIMINATION
    BURGESS, AE
    WAGNER, RF
    JENNINGS, RJ
    BARLOW, HB
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1981, 214 (4516) : 93 - 94
  • [5] DIFFRACTION CORRECTION METHODS FOR PULSE-ECHO ACOUSTIC ATTENUATION ESTIMATION
    CESPEDES, I
    OPHIR, J
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 16 (07) : 707 - 717
  • [6] ELASTOGRAPHY - ELASTICITY IMAGING USING ULTRASOUND WITH APPLICATION TO MUSCLE AND BREAST IN-VIVO
    CESPEDES, I
    OPHIR, J
    PONNEKANTI, H
    MAKLAD, N
    [J]. ULTRASONIC IMAGING, 1993, 15 (02) : 73 - 88
  • [7] REDUCTION OF IMAGE NOISE IN ELASTOGRAPHY
    CESPEDES, I
    OPHIR, J
    [J]. ULTRASONIC IMAGING, 1993, 15 (02) : 89 - 102
  • [8] ANALYSIS OF VARIATIONS IN CONTRAST-DETAIL EXPERIMENTS
    COHEN, G
    MCDANIEL, DL
    WAGNER, LK
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1984, 11 (04) : 469 - 473
  • [9] Goodman J. W., 1975, Laser speckle and related phenomena, P9
  • [10] GREEN DM, 1966, SIGNAL DETECTION THE