CHARACTERISTIC RESPONSES OF 3 TROPICAL LEGUMES TO THE INOCULATION OF 2 SPECIES OF VAM FUNGI IN ANDOSOL SOILS WITH DIFFERENT FERTILITIES

被引:23
作者
AHIABOR, BD
HIRATA, H
机构
[1] Laboratory of Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, 183, Fuchu
关键词
ANDOSOL; LEGUMES; MINERAL NUTRITION PLANT GROWTH; VAM FUNGI;
D O I
10.1007/BF00204021
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The growth and mineral nutrition responses were evaluated of three tropical legumes, cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. cv Kuromame), pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan L. (Millsp.) cv ICPL 86009] and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea cv Nakateyutaka) inoculated with two different species of VAM fungi, Glomus sp. (Glomus etunicatum-like species) and Gigaspora margarita, and grown in Andosols with different fertilities [Bray II-P: topsoil (72 ppm), subsoil (< 0.1 ppm)]. Percent fungal root colonization was high in cowpea and groundnut but relatively low in pigeonpea in both soil types. Despite the low rate of root infection, significant growth responses were produced, especially in the inoculated pigeonpea plant. In all legumes, shoot dry matter production was favoured by the inoculations. Increases in shoot biomass due to mycorrhizae were greater in the subsoil than in the topsoil. Mycorrhization raised shoot concentrations of P and Ca (in cowpea and groundnut) and P and K (in pigeonpea) in the topsoil. Whereas the P concentration in shoots in the subsoil was not positively affected by VAM fungi, particularly in cowpea and pigeonpea, the concentration of K in such plants was significantly increased by VAM treatment. The results also showed that mycorrhizal enhancement of shoot micronutrient concentrations was very rare in all plants, with negative effects observed in certain cases. Cu concentration, in particular, was not affected by VAM formation in any of the plants, and Mn and Fe in pigeonpea and groundnut, respectively, remained the same whether plants were mycorrhizal or not. In both soils the three legumes responded to Glomus sp. better than to Gigaspora margarita, and the effects of the VAM fungi on each of the crops relative to the controls were greater in the subsoil than in the topsoil. However, shoot growth of groundnut was not affected as much as cowpea and pigeonpea by the type of soil used. In spite of the relatively low infection of its root, pigeonpea was generally the most responsive of the three legume species in terms of mycorrhizal/nonmycorrhizal ratios.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 70
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   EFFECTS OF A VESICULAR-ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGUS ON NITRATE REDUCTASE AND NITROGENASE ACTIVITIES IN NODULATING AND NON-NODULATING SOYBEANS [J].
CARLING, DE ;
RIEHLE, WG ;
BROWN, MF ;
JOHNSON, DR .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1978, 68 (11) :1590-1596
[2]  
COOPER KM, 1984, VA MYCORRHIZA, P155
[3]   STUDIES ON NODULATED AND MYCORRHIZAL PEANUTS [J].
DAFT, MJ ;
ELGIAHMI, AA .
ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1976, 83 (02) :273-276
[4]   EFFECT OF MYCORRHIZA ON GROWTH OF MAIZE [J].
GERDEMANN, JW .
MYCOLOGIA, 1964, 56 (03) :342-&
[5]   AN EVALUATION OF TECHNIQUES FOR MEASURING VESICULAR ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL INFECTION IN ROOTS [J].
GIOVANNETTI, M ;
MOSSE, B .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1980, 84 (03) :489-500
[6]  
Janos D. P., 1987, ECOPHYSIOLOGY VA MYC, P107
[7]   THE DILUTION EFFECT IN PLANT NUTRITION STUDIES [J].
JARRELL, WM ;
BEVERLY, RB .
ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, 1981, 34 :197-224
[8]   PHOTOSYNTHATE PARTITIONING IN SPLIT-ROOT CITRUS SEEDLINGS WITH MYCORRHIZAL AND NONMYCORRHIZAL ROOT SYSTEMS [J].
KOCH, KE ;
JOHNSON, CR .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1984, 75 (01) :26-30
[9]  
Kormanik P. P., 1982, Methods and principles of mycorrhizal research., P37
[10]   GROWTH AND NUTRIENT-UPTAKE OF PEANUT INOCULATED WITH THE MYCORRHIZAL FUNGUS GLOMUS-FASCICULATUM COMPARED WITH NON-INOCULATED ONES [J].
KRISHNA, KR ;
BAGYARAJ, DJ .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1984, 77 (2-3) :405-408