CORTICAL ORGANIZATION IN ADULTHOOD IS MODIFIED BY NEONATAL INFARCT - A CASE-STUDY

被引:46
作者
LEWINE, JD
ASTUR, RS
DAVIS, LE
KNIGHT, JE
MACLIN, EL
ORRISON, WW
机构
[1] UNIV NEW MEXICO, SCH MED, DEPT RADIOL, ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87131 USA
[2] UNIV NEW MEXICO, SCH MED, DEPT PSYCHOL, ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87131 USA
[3] UNIV NEW MEXICO, SCH MED, DEPT NEUROL, ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87131 USA
[4] NEW MEXICO REG FED MED CTR, ALBUQUERQUE, NM USA
关键词
BRAIN; FUNCTION; INFARCTION; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.190.1.8259435
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To assess anomalous cortical organization of somatosensory function in a 23-year-old man who had had a neonatal infarct involving the left middle cerebral artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The infarct destroyed the primary and secondary somatosensory areas of the subject's left hemisphere but caused only mild perturbation of somatosensation on the right side of his body. With magnetic source imaging, the authors integrated magnetoencephalographic data with magnetic resonance imaging data to create magnetic source localization images that showed the mapping between brain function and structure. RESULTS: Electrical stimulation of the right median nerve evoked activity in two nontraditional areas: (a) an intact region of the left inferior temporal gyrus and (b) the ipsilateral right medial parietal cortex. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that bilateral neural reorganization can be induced by unilateral neonatal damage.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 96
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   LANGUAGE-ACQUISITION FOLLOWING HEMIDECORTICATION - LINGUISTIC SUPERIORITY OF LEFT OVER RIGHT HEMISPHERE [J].
DENNIS, M ;
WHITAKER, HA .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1976, 3 (03) :404-433
[2]   CONCERNING THE MECHANISM OF RECOVERY IN STROKE HEMIPLEGIA [J].
FISHER, CM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1992, 19 (01) :57-63
[3]   NEUROMAGNETIC RESPONSES FROM THE 2ND SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX IN MAN [J].
HARI, R ;
HAMALAINEN, M ;
KAUKORANTA, E ;
REINIKAINEN, K ;
TESZNER, D .
ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1983, 68 (04) :207-212
[4]  
KLEIN SK, 1991, ANN NEUROL, V30, P475
[5]  
LEWIS M, 1990, NEW YORK TIMES BK R, P3
[6]  
NAGATA K, 1991, ANN NEUROL, V30, P238
[7]  
ORRISON WW, 1992, AM J NEURORADIOL, V13, P1124
[8]   COMPARISON OF CT, LOW-FIELD-STRENGTH MR IMAGING, AND HIGH-FIELD-STRENGTH MR IMAGING - WORK IN PROGRESS [J].
ORRISON, WW ;
STIMAC, GK ;
STEVENS, EA ;
LAMASTERS, DL ;
ESPINOSA, MC ;
COBB, L ;
METTLER, FA .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 181 (01) :121-127
[9]  
ORRISON WW, 1990, AM J NEURORADIOL, V11, P713
[10]  
QUENCER RM, 1990, AM J NEURORADIOL, V11, P717