GRADIENT ELUTION METHODS FOR PREDICTING ISOCRATIC CONDITIONS

被引:25
作者
SCHOENMAKERS, PJ
BARTHA, A
BILLIET, HAH
机构
[1] ASTRA LAKEMEDEL AB,PHARMACEUT PROD,S-15185 SODERTALJE,SWEDEN
[2] DELFT UNIV TECHNOL,DEPT BIOCHEM,2628 RZ DELFT,NETHERLANDS
来源
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY | 1991年 / 550卷 / 1-2期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0021-9673(01)88554-X
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Gradient elution methods can elegantly be used for rapidly establishing the appropriate isocratic elution conditions for newly chromatographed samples. In comparison with the conventional approach of running a number of isocratic chromatograms on a trial-and-error basis, gradient elution methods can be much more efficient and yield more consistent results. Key factors are a description of the retention behaviour of the solutes under isocratic conditions as a function of the programmed parameters and an accurate knowledge of the actual gradient profile, i.e., the variation of the programmed parameters with time. Reasonably simple calculation procedures are facilitated by the use of simple (e.g., linear) programmes and instrumentation that affects the actual profile as little as possible. For non-ionic solutes two different gradient scans suffice in principle. In certain cases a single gradient scan may be adequate. A combination of one gradient scan and one isocratic verification experiment can often be used for the accurate prediction of optimum isocratic conditions. For ionic solutes a larger number of scanning experiments are needed than for non-ionic solutes, but in comparison with the time needed for trial-and-error optimization the potential benefits of gradient scanning methods are much greater. For characterizing the ionic solutes in unknown samples two things are needed. First, the solutes need to be classified according to their type (weak or strong; acids or bases) and charge. Next, the optimum isocratic conditions should be established. The concentration of organic modifier, the pH and the type and concentration of ion-pair reagent are the most important parameters to be considered in the process. Using linear gradients at two different pH values in combination with "pulse injection" of ion-pairing reagents, four scanning experiments form the basis of an efficient classification procedure. Once the solutes have been classified, simple, stepwise procedures can be used to establish optimum isocratic conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 447
页数:23
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   COMPUTER-ASSISTED RETENTION PREDICTION FOR HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY IN THE ION-EXCHANGE MODE [J].
BABA, Y .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1989, 485 :143-168
[2]   RATIONALIZATION OF THE SELECTION OF THE TYPE OF THE ORGANIC MODIFIER(S) FOR SELECTIVITY OPTIMIZATION IN REVERSED-PHASE ION-PAIR CHROMATOGRAPHY [J].
BARTHA, A ;
VIGH, G ;
STAHLBERG, J .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1989, 485 :403-419
[3]  
BARTHA A, 1989, J CHROMATOGR, V464, P225
[4]   STUDIES IN REVERSED-PHASE ION-PAIR CHROMATOGRAPHY .4. THE ROLE OF THE CHAIN-LENGTH OF THE PAIRING ION [J].
BARTHA, A ;
VIGH, G ;
BILLIET, HAH ;
DEGALAN, L .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1984, 303 (01) :29-38
[5]   BASIS OF THE RATIONAL SELECTION OF THE HYDROPHOBICITY AND CONCENTRATION OF THE ION-PAIRING REAGENT IN REVERSED-PHASE ION-PAIR HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY [J].
BARTHA, A ;
VIGH, G ;
VARGAPUCHONY, Z .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1990, 499 :423-434
[6]   RULE-BASED APPROACH FOR THE DETERMINATION OF SOLUTE TYPES IN UNKNOWN SAMPLE MIXTURES AS A 1ST STEP OF OPTIMIZATION PARAMETER SELECTION IN REVERSED-PHASE ION-PAIR CHROMATOGRAPHY [J].
BARTHA, A ;
VIGH, G .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1989, 485 :383-401
[7]  
Bartha A., UNPUB
[8]  
BERRIDGE JC, 1985, TECHNIQUES AUTOMATED, P45
[9]   SEQUENTIAL ISOCRATIC STEP LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY - A HIGH-THROUGHPUT, PROBLEM-SOLVING APPROACH WITH SENSITIVE, NEAR-UNIVERSAL DETECTION FOR WIDE POLARITY MIXTURES [J].
BERRY, VV .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1980, 199 (OCT) :219-238
[10]   UNIVERSAL LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY METHODS .5. PULSING WITH WEAK ELUENT TO RESOLVE PEAKS [J].
BERRY, VV .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1985, 321 (01) :33-43