MASS-DIAMETER REGRESSIONS FOR MOOSE BROWSE ON THE COPPER RIVER DELTA, ALASKA

被引:21
作者
MACCRACKEN, JG
VANBALLENBERGHE, V
机构
[1] UNIV IDAHO,DEPT FISH & WILDLIFE RESOURCES,MOSCOW,ID 83843
[2] USDA,FOREST SERV,INST NO FORESTRY,ANCHORAGE,AK 99501
来源
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT | 1993年 / 46卷 / 04期
关键词
ALASKA; ALCES-ALCES; BROWSE; COPPER RIVER DELTA; MASS ESTIMATES; MOOSE; PREDICTIVE REGRESSION EQUATIONS;
D O I
10.2307/4002462
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Regression equations were developed to predict 3 mass components of 7 browse species important to moose (Alces alces gigas) on the Copper River Delta in southcentral Alaska. The accuracy of model predictions was the criterion for model selection. Model accuracy was evaluated using data splitting or jackknife procedures. Annual production of twigs and leaves and available twig mass on a stem were most accurately predicted from stem basal diameter with zero intercept models, zero intercept log-linear models, or log-log models. Twig mass eaten by moose was most accurately predicted from the diameter at the point of browsing of a twig with zero intercept or full linear models. Heteroskedasticity was significant (P<0.05) in most of the data sets and could not be significantly reduced with log transformations or use of weighted least squares models. Heteroskedasticity appeared to have a relatively minor effect on model predictions. Most of the models gave mean predictions within +/- 20% of the actual values, particularly for the most ubiquitous species that were also the most important to moose. For each species, there were few differences (P<0.05) in model coefficients between years and among habitat types. Differences in coefficient estimates appeared to be related to differences in stem morphology that were related to both site conditions and past browsing by moose.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 308
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
ALABACK PB, 1986, NORTHWEST SCI, V60, P90
[2]  
BASILE JOSEPH V., 1966, J RANGE MANAGE, V19, P34, DOI 10.2307/3895522
[3]  
BASKERVILLE G L, 1972, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, V2, P49, DOI 10.1139/x72-009
[4]  
BROWN JK, 1976, CAN J FOREST RES, V6, P154
[5]   ESTIMATING OVERWINTER BITTERBRUSH UTILIZATION FROM TWIG DIAMETER-LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONS [J].
FERGUSON, RB ;
MARSDEN, MA .
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1977, 30 (03) :231-236
[6]  
GLEISER H, 1969, J AM STAT ASSOC, V64, P316
[7]  
Koutsoyiannis A., 1977, THEORY ECONOMETRICS
[8]  
Krebs C J, 1989, ECOLOGICAL METHODOLO
[9]   CAUTIONARY NOTE ABOUT R2 [J].
KVALSETH, TO .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1985, 39 (04) :279-285