RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF LAXATIVES IN TREATMENT OF CHILDHOOD ENCOPRESIS

被引:100
作者
NOLAN, T
DEBELLE, G
OBERKLAID, F
COFFEY, C
机构
[1] ROYAL CHILDRENS HOSP,DEPT AMBULATORY PAEDIAT,PARKVILLE,VIC 3052,AUSTRALIA
[2] UNIV MELBOURNE,DEPT PAEDIAT,PARKVILLE,VIC 3052,AUSTRALIA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0140-6736(91)91097-E
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Primary faecal incontinence (encopresis) in children is usually treated with laxative medication and a behaviour modification programme aimed at promoting regular toileting, but the effectiveness of laxatives has never been adequately investigated. 169 children with encopresis and evidence of stool on plain abdominal radiograph were randomly allocated to receive multimodal (MM) therapy (laxatives plus behaviour modification; n = 83) or behaviour modification alone (BM; n = 86). Mean (SD) follow-up was 55.1 (27.0) weeks and 56.7 (32.0) weeks, respectively. By 12 months' follow-up 42 (51%) of the MM group and 31 (36%) of the BM group (p = 0.079) had achieved remission (at least one 4 week period with no soiling episodes) and 52 (63%) vs 37 (43%) (p = 0.016) had achieved at least partial remission (soiling no more than once a week). MM subjects achieved remission significantly sooner than BM subjects, and the difference in the Kaplan-Meier remission curves was most striking in the first 30 weeks of follow-up (p = 0.012). The patterns of compliance with toileting in the treatment groups were almost identical, although about 1 in 8 children overall did not comply with the sitting programme. After exclusion of the 24 poor compliers, there was no significant difference between BM and MM groups. This study shows a clear advantage overall for the use of laxative medication, although the benefit may not be as great for children who are able to maintain regular toileting.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 527
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
ACHENBACH TM, 1983, MANUAL CHILD BEHAVIO
[2]   CHRONIC AND OCCULT STOOL RETENTION - CLINICAL TOOL FOR ITS EVALUATION IN SCHOOL-AGED CHILDREN [J].
BARR, RG ;
LEVINE, MD ;
WILKINSON, RH ;
MULVIHILL, D .
CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 1979, 18 (11) :674-&
[3]  
BELLMAN M, 1966, ACTA PAEDIATR SC S, V170, P1
[4]   A CONTROLLED TRIAL OF SENOKOT IN FECAL SOILING TREATED BY BEHAVIORAL-METHODS [J].
BERG, I ;
FORSYTHE, I ;
HOLT, P ;
WATTS, J .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY AND ALLIED DISCIPLINES, 1983, 24 (04) :543-549
[5]  
DEBELLE G, 1989, AUST PAEDIATR J, V10, P334
[6]  
Freedman L S, 1982, Stat Med, V1, P121, DOI 10.1002/sim.4780010204
[7]  
GREEN LW, 1970, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V85, P815, DOI 10.2307/4593972
[8]   TREATMENT OF ENCOPRETIC CHILDREN [J].
HALPERN, WI .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 1977, 16 (03) :478-499
[9]   PEDIATRICIANS VIEWS ON MANAGEMENT OF ENCOPRESIS [J].
JOLLY, H .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE-LONDON, 1976, 69 (01) :21-22
[10]   FURTHER COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF PRETEST-POSTTEST RESEARCH DESIGNS [J].
LAIRD, N .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1983, 37 (04) :329-330