Pain-related somatosensory evoked magnetic fields

被引:79
作者
Kitamura, Y [1 ]
Kakigi, R [1 ]
Hoshiyama, M [1 ]
Koyama, S [1 ]
Shimojo, M [1 ]
Watanabe, S [1 ]
机构
[1] NATL INST PHYSIOL SCI, DEPT INTEGRAT PHYSIOL, OKAZAKI, AICHI 444, JAPAN
来源
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1995年 / 95卷 / 06期
关键词
somatosensory evoked magnetic fields; magnetoencephalography; superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID); painful stimulation; cinglate cortex; second sensory cortex;
D O I
10.1016/0013-4694(95)00139-5
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) following painful electrical stimulation of the finger were investigated in 5 normal subjects. Equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) of deflections shorter than 100 msec in latency were located in the primary sensory cortex (SI) in the hemisphere contralateral to the stimulated finger following either non-painful or painful stimulation. Two main deflections, N100m-P100m and N250m-P250m, were independently identified following painful stimulation, although they were not found in SEFs following non-painful weak stimulation. ECDs of the N100m-P100m were considered to be located in the bilateral second sensory cortices (SII). ECDs of the N250m-P250m were identified in the bilateral cingulate cortices and SII, but the intersubject difference was large. Therefore, we considered that contralateral SI and bilateral SII were initially activated by painful noxious stimulation, and then multiple areas including bilateral Sn and cingulate cortices were activated. In EEG recordings (evoked potentials), no potential corresponding to N100m-P100m was found, probably because it was difficult to record activation in SII by EEG recordings. The P250 potential which corresponded to the N250m-P250m was clearly identified, probably because activation of multiple areas generated large long-duration EEG potentials which were maximal around the vertex, unlike MEG recordings.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 474
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   SPATIOTEMPORAL MODELING OF CEREBRAL EVOKED MAGNETIC-FIELDS TO MEDIAN NERVE-STIMULATION [J].
BAUMGARTNER, C ;
SUTHERLING, WW ;
DI, S ;
BARTH, DS .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 79 (01) :27-35
[2]   SOMATICALLY EVOKED MAGNETIC-FIELDS OF HUMAN-BRAIN [J].
BRENNER, D ;
LIPTON, J ;
KAUFMAN, L ;
WILLIAMSON, SJ .
SCIENCE, 1978, 199 (4324) :81-83
[3]   PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS OF PAIN-RELATED CEREBRAL POTENTIALS TO MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION IN MAN [J].
BROMM, B ;
SCHAREIN, E .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1982, 53 (01) :94-103
[4]  
Burton H., 1986, SENSORY MOTOR AREAS, P31, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4613-2149-1_2
[5]  
CHEN ACN, 1980, EXP BRAIN RES, V39, P359
[6]  
DOWMAN R, 1994, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V92, P373, DOI 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90014-0
[7]   SEP TOPOGRAPHIES ELICITED BY INNOCUOUS AND NOXIOUS SURAL NERVE-STIMULATION .1. IDENTIFICATION OF STABLE PERIODS AND INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES [J].
DOWMAN, R .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 92 (04) :291-302
[8]   SEP TOPOGRAPHIES ELICITED BY INNOCUOUS AND NOXIOUS SURAL NERVE-STIMULATION .2. EFFECTS OF STIMULUS-INTENSITY ON TOPOGRAPHIC PATTERN AND AMPLITUDE [J].
DOWMAN, R .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 92 (04) :303-315
[10]   ON BRAIN MAGNETIC RESPONSES TO SENSORY STIMULI [J].
HARI, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 8 (02) :157-169