NEEDLE-TIP LOCALIZATION DURING CT-GUIDED ABDOMINAL BIOPSY - COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND SPIRAL CT

OBJECTIVE. This study was performed to determine whether the time required for needle-tip localization during biopsy of the abdomen would be reduced if continuous-volume data acquisition, also known as spiral CT, were used for guidance instead of conventional CT. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Forty patients had biopsies of an abdominal mass; half underwent needle-tip localizations with conventional CT and half with spiral CT. The times required to localize the needle for 104 needle passes were calculated; scanning and reconstruction times were included, and the radiologist's technique and procedural difficulties were deliberately excluded. The mean needle localization times with conventional and spiral CT were compared for the upper abdominal and pelvic regions by using the two-tailed unpaired Student's t-test. RESULTS. The mean time (+/- SE) for spiral CT was 35 +/- 2 sec compared with 105 +/- 18 sec for conventional CT (p < .001). When analyzed by region, times with spiral CT were shorter in both the upper abdomen (means, 37 sec for spiral CT vs 150 sec for conventional CT, p < .001) and pelvis (means, 25 sec for spiral CT vs 74 sec for conventional CT, p = .038); the magnitude of the improvement was greater in the upper abdomen. CONCLUSION. The time required to find the needle tip during guided biopsy of an abdominal mass is reduced with spiral CT compared with conventional CT. This improvement is partly a result of the ability to eliminate respiratory misregistration with spiral CT, which is not possible with conventional multisectional CT; hence the greater advantage in upper abdominal biopsy.