DIFFERENTIAL-EFFECTS OF LIDOCAINE ON DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLD WITH MONOPHASIC VERSUS BIPHASIC SHOCK WAVE-FORMS

Background Defibrillation waveforms and antiarrhythmic drugs have disparate effects on myocardial excitability and refractoriness, making it likely that antiarrhythmic drugs will interact with one waveform differently than with another. The aim of the present study was to determine if the increase in defibrillation threshold (DFT) induced by lidocaine is similar for electrical shocks with monophasic and biphasic waveforms. Methods and Results Twenty-six pentobarbital-anesthetized farm-raised pigs were instrumented with pacing catheters and epicardial defibrillation electrodes. Each pig was assigned to one of four groups: (1) monophasic shock waveform and placebo (5% dextrose in water [D5W]) (n=7), (2) monophasic shock waveform and lidocaine (n=7), (3) biphasic shock waveform add placebo (D5W) (n=5), or (4) biphasic shock waveform and lidocaine (n=7). DFT was measured at baseline and subsequently during treatment (D5W or lidocaine). In the monophasic waveform groups, DFT increased from baseline in response to lidocaine by 92% (P<.0001), whereas DFT values in response to D5W did not change. In the biphasic waveform groups, DFT values did not change from baseline in response to lidocaine (P=NS), whereas DFT values from baseline in response to D5W significantly decreased by 29% (P=.04). In the monophasic waveform groups, the change in DFT from baseline in response to lidocaine was significantly different than the change from baseline in response to D5W (92+/-29% versus -0.5+/-29%, respectively) (P<.0002). In the biphasic waveform groups, however, the change in DFT from baseline in response to lidocaine was similar to the change from baseline in response to D5W (-5.66+/-15% versus -29+/-17%, respectively) (P=.48). Furthermore, the change in DFT from baseline in response to lidocaine differed significantly between monophasic and biphasic waveform groups (92+/-29% versus -5.66+/-15%) (P<.0002), whereas the change from baseline in response to D5W did not differ between monophasic and biphasic waveforms (-0.5+/-29% versus -29+/-17%) (P=.34). Conclusions Compared with placebo groups, DFT values increased during lidocaine treatment to a much greater degree in the monophasic waveform group than in the biphasic waveform group receiving lidocaine. These data support our hypothesis that antiarrhythmic drugs can affect the defibrillation efficacy of monophasic waveforms differently than that of biphasic waveforms.