QUANTITATIVE MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING PARAMETERS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO MAMMOGRAPHIC PATTERN

被引:38
作者
POON, CS
BRONSKILL, MJ
HENKELMAN, RM
BOYD, NF
机构
[1] UNIV TORONTO,SUNNYBROOK HLTH SCI CTR,REICHMANN RES BLDG,S113,2075 BAYVIEW AVE,TORONTO M4N 3M5,ONTARIO,CANADA
[2] ONTARIO CANC INST,TORONTO M4X 1K9,ONTARIO,CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnci/84.10.777
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Breast cancer exhibits wide international variation in incidence, which has led to the identification of several factors correlating with the risk of the disease. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques can provide quantitative information about the biological and physical properties of tissue. Purpose: This work tested several magnetic resonance tissue parameters for their ability to distinguish quantitatively between breast tissues in subjects at substantially different risk for breast cancer as defined indirectly by their parenchymal pattern on mammograms. Methods: Quantitative MRI parameters (relative water content, longitudinal relaxation time [T1], and transverse relaxation time [T2]) were measured for breast tissue using newly developed techniques in two groups of women with mammographic parenchymal appearance associated with high (Dy pattern [i.e., extensive nodular or diffuse density]; n = 12) or low (N1 pattern [i.e., breast containing mainly fat]; n = 11) risk of breast cancer. Results: The two groups have significantly different average relative water content (P < .0001) and average T1 (P < .0001). Pixel histograms of T2 values show marked differences between the two groups which can be characterized with a fourth moment parameter. Conclusions: Quantitative MRI techniques exhibit good potential for assessing tissue characteristics in the breast that are associated with risk of breast cancer. Implications: Future work will address the direct correlation of MRI parameters with risk of breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 781
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   SIMPLE PROTON SPECTROSCOPIC IMAGING [J].
DIXON, WT .
RADIOLOGY, 1984, 153 (01) :189-194
[2]  
DOLL R, 1981, J NATL CANCER I, V66, P1192
[3]   MAMMOGRAPHIC PARENCHYMAL PATTERN AND BREAST-CANCER RISK - A CRITICAL-APPRAISAL OF THE EVIDENCE [J].
GOODWIN, PJ ;
BOYD, NF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1988, 127 (06) :1097-1108
[4]   PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION AND OPTIMIZATION OF ONE-SHOT T1 IMAGING [J].
KAY, I ;
HENKELMAN, RM .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1991, 22 (02) :414-424
[5]  
Kelsey J L, 1979, Epidemiol Rev, V1, P74
[6]   MENSTRUAL VARIATION OF NORMAL BREAST NMR RELAXATION PARAMETERS [J].
NELSON, TR ;
PRETORIUS, DH ;
SCHIFFER, LM .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1985, 9 (05) :875-879
[7]  
POON C S, 1989, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, V7, P181
[8]   FAT WATER QUANTITATION AND DIFFERENTIAL RELAXATION-TIME MEASUREMENT USING CHEMICAL-SHIFT IMAGING TECHNIQUE [J].
POON, CS ;
SZUMOWSKI, J ;
PLEWES, DB ;
ASHBY, P ;
HENKELMAN, RM .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1989, 7 (04) :369-382
[9]  
Press W.H., 1994, NUMERICAL RECIPES C, V2nd ed.
[10]   MAMMOGRAPHIC PARENCHYMAL PATTERNS AND BREAST-CANCER RISK [J].
SAFTLAS, AF ;
SZKLO, M .
EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 1987, 9 :146-174