CHANGES IN MR SIGNAL INTENSITY AND CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT OF THERAPEUTICALLY IRRADIATED SOFT-TISSUE

被引:17
作者
FLETCHER, BD
HANNA, SL
KUN, LE
机构
[1] Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis
[2] Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis
[3] Department of Radiology, University of Tennessee, Memphis
关键词
Magnetic resonance; contrast enhancement; tissue characterization; Radiation injury/effects; Therapeutic radiology; in infants and children;
D O I
10.1016/0730-725X(90)90013-R
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Increased MR signal intensity was observed on T2-weighted, STIR, and Gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced T1-weighted images of subcutaneous and muscular soft tissue in 9 of 10 children treated with combination chemotheraphy and radiation therapy (RT) for malignancy in the pelvis or an extremity. Total radiation doses ranged from 59.5 to 65 Gy. Eight of the patients with these changes received hyperfractionated RT (seven for Ewing sarcoma and one for perineal rhabdomyosarcoma); one was treated for pelvic hemangiopericytoma with once-daily fractions. Evidence of soft tissue damage became apparent as early as the sixth week of RT and was seen for up to 69 wk post-RT. There was no clear MR evidence of RT-induced soft tissue damage in one patient, who underwent hyperfractionated RT for pelvic rhabdomyosarcoma. Other MR findings in this group included evidence of bladder wall thickening in three of the seven patients given pelvic RT and increased T1-weighted signal of irradiated marrow in nine patients. All patients had clinical evidence of skin, soft tissue, or epithelial radiation effects. Increased MR signal intensity secondary to RT-induced damage can be differentiated from widespread tumor by geometric borders that conform to the margins of the radiation field. © 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:771 / 777
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Bottomley, Foster, Argersinger, Pfeifer, A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1–100 MHz: Dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age, Med. Phys., 11, pp. 425-448, (1984)
[2]  
Mitchell, Burk, Vinitski, Rifkin, The biophysical basis of tissue contrast in extracranial MR imaging, AJR, 149, pp. 831-837, (1987)
[3]  
Fleckenstein, Weatherall, Parkey, Payne, Peshock, Sports-related muscle injuries: evaluation with MR imaging, Radiology, 172, pp. 793-798, (1989)
[4]  
Huber, Sumers, Klein, Soft tissue pseudotumor following intramuscular injection of “DPT”: A pitfall in magnetic resonance imaging, Skeletal Radiol., 16, pp. 469-473, (1987)
[5]  
Zagoria, Karstaedt, Koubek, MR Imaging of Rhabdomyolysis, J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 10, pp. 268-270, (1986)
[6]  
Pan, Raymond, Carrasco, Wallace, Kim, Shirkhoda, Jaffe, Murray, Benjamin, Osteosarcoma: MR imaging after preoperative chemotherapy, Radiology, 174, pp. 517-526, (1990)
[7]  
Fleckenstein, Canby, Parkey, Peshock, Acute effects of exercise on MR imaging of skeletal muscle in normal volunteers, AJR, 151, pp. 231-237, (1988)
[8]  
Vanel, Lacombe, Couanet, Kalifa, Spielmann, Genin, Musculoskeletal tumors: Follow-up with MR imaging after treatment with surgery and radiation therapy, Radiology, 164, pp. 243-245, (1987)
[9]  
Ramsey, Zacharias, MR imaging of the spine after radiation therapy: Easily recognizable effects, AJR, 144, pp. 1131-1135, (1985)
[10]  
Remedios, Colletti, Raval, Benson, Chak, Boswell, Halls, Magnetic resonance imaging of bone after radiation, Magn. Reson. Imaging, 6, pp. 301-304, (1988)