TL-201 FOR ASSESSMENT OF MYOCARDIAL VIABILITY - QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF 24-HOUR REDISTRIBUTION IMAGING WITH IMAGING AFTER REINJECTION AT REST

Redistribution thallium-201 imaging 2 to 4 h after exercise may be incomplete and therefore may be inadequate to fully assess myocardial variability. Late redistribution imaging 24 h after exercise has been proposed to overcome this limitation of thallium stress imaging. However, because of poor count density the image quality on these studies is often suboptimal. In the present study the diagnostic information on 24-h planar thallium redistribution images was compared with that on images obtained after a reinjection of thallium at rest. Eighty-four patients with a stress thallium-201 defect had delayed redistribution imaging after 2 to 4 h and 24 h later, and again after an injection of thallium at rest. Defect reversibility on 24-h redistribution images was compared quantitatively with that on images after injection of thallium at rest. The quality of thallium images at rest was consistently better than that of 24-h redistribution images. Poor quality studies occurred in 13% of 24-h redistribution images compared with 0.4% of the studies at rest. Significantly more defect reversibility was detected on images after the reinjection at rest. Of 41 patients who appeared to have a fixed defect at 2- to 4-h redistribution imaging, 11 (27%) had a reversible defect by 24-h redistribution imaging compared with 29 (71%) after thallium-201 reinjection. No clinical variables at the time of stress testing were predictive of late defect reversibility. It is concluded that in patients with fixed a thallium defect at 2 to 4 h after exercise, reimaging after a reinjection at rest provides better diagnostic information than does 24-h late redistribution imaging.