THE TCD50 AND REGROWTH DELAY ASSAY IN HUMAN TUMOR XENOGRAFTS - DIFFERENCES AND IMPLICATIONS

被引:22
作者
BUDACH, W
BUDACH, V
STUSCHKE, M
DINGES, S
SACK, H
机构
[1] Dept. of Radiation Oncology, West German Tumor Center, University of Essen, 4300 Essen
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1993年 / 25卷 / 02期
关键词
HUMAN XENOGRAFTS; TCD50; REGROWTH DELAY;
D O I
10.1016/0360-3016(93)90347-X
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The response to irradiation of five human xenograft cell lines-a malignant paraganglioma, a neurogenic sarcoma, a malignant histiocytoma, a primary lymphoma of the brain, and a squamous cell carcinoma-were tested in nude mice. All mice underwent 5 Gy whole body irradiation prior to xenotransplantation to minimize the residual immune response. The subcutaneous tumors were irradiated at a tumor volume of 120mm3 under acutely hypoxic conditions with single doses between 8 Gy and 80 Gy depending on the expected radiation sensitivity of the tumor line. Endpoints of the study were the tumor control dose 50% (TCD50) and the regrowth delay endpoints growth delay, specific growth delay, and the tumor bed effect corrected specific growth delay. Specific growth delay and corrected specific growth delay at 76% of the TCD50 was used in order to compare the data to previously published data from spheroids. The lowest TCD50 was found in the lymphoma with 24.9 Gy, whereas the TCD50 of the soft tissue sarcomas and the squamous cell carcinoma ranged from 57.8 Gy to 65.6 Gy. The isoeffective dose levels for the induction of 30 days growth delay, a specific growth delay of 3, and a corrected specific growth delay of 3 ranged from 15.5 Gy (ECL1) to 37.1 Gy (FADU), from 7.2 Gy (ENE2) to 45.6 Gy (EPG1) and from 9.2 Gy (ENE2) to 37.6 Gy (EPGI), respectively. The corrected specific growth delay at 76% of the TCD50 was correlated with the number of tumor rescue units per 100 cells in spheroids, which was available for three tumor lines, and with the tumor doubling time in xenografts (n = 5). The TCD50 values corresponded better to the clinical experience than the regrowth delay data. There was no correlation between TCD50 and any of the regrowth delay endpoints. This missing correlation was most likely a result of large differences in the number of tumor rescue units in human xenografts of the same size.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 268
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] RESPONSE OF HUMAN SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA XENOGRAFTS OF DIFFERENT SIZES TO IRRADIATION - RELATIONSHIP OF CLONOGENIC CELLS, CELLULAR RADIATION SENSITIVITY INVIVO, AND TUMOR RESCUING UNITS
    BAUMANN, M
    DUBOIS, W
    SUIT, HD
    [J]. RADIATION RESEARCH, 1990, 123 (03) : 325 - 330
  • [2] COMPARISON BETWEEN INVITRO RADIOSENSITIVITY AND INVIVO RADIORESPONSE IN MURINE TUMOR-CELL LINES .2. INVIVO RADIORESPONSE FOLLOWING FRACTIONATED TREATMENT AND INVITRO INVIVO CORRELATIONS
    BRISTOW, RG
    HILL, RP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1990, 18 (02): : 331 - 345
  • [3] BUDACH V, 1990, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V166, P14
  • [4] RADIATION RESPONSE IN 10 HIGH-GRADE HUMAN SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMA XENOGRAFTS TO PHOTONS AND FAST-NEUTRONS
    BUDACH, V
    STUSCHKE, M
    BUDACH, W
    MOLLS, M
    SACK, H
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1990, 19 (04): : 941 - 943
  • [5] BUDACH V, 1989, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V165, P500
  • [6] RADIOSENSITIVITY AND REPAIR CAPACITY OF 2 XENOGRAFTED HUMAN SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMAS TO PHOTONS AND FAST-NEUTRONS
    BUDACH, V
    STUSCHKE, M
    BUDACH, W
    KRAUSE, U
    STREFFER, C
    SACK, H
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 1989, 56 (05) : 593 - 596
  • [7] DENEKAMP J, 1980, BRIT J CANCER, V41, P56
  • [8] FOWLER JF, 1980, BRIT J CANCER, V41, P102
  • [9] CELL-POPULATION KINETICS OF THE RHABDOMYOSARCOMA R1H OF THE RAT AFTER SINGLE DOSES OF X-RAYS
    JUNG, H
    KRUGER, HJ
    BRAMMER, I
    ZYWIETZ, F
    BECKBORNHOLDT, HP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 1990, 57 (03) : 567 - 589
  • [10] RESPONSE OF HUMAN-TUMOR XENOGRAFTS TO FRACTIONATED X-IRRADIATION
    LINDENBERGER, J
    HERMEKING, H
    KUMMERMEHR, J
    DENEKAMP, J
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1986, 6 (01) : 15 - 27