MULTICRITERION VALIDATION OF A SEMIDISTRIBUTED CONCEPTUAL-MODEL OF THE WATER CYCLE IN THE FECHT CATCHMENT (VOSGES MASSIF, FRANCE)

被引:50
作者
AMBROISE, B
PERRIN, JL
REUTENAUER, D
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1029/94WR03293
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Model validation is still a crucial issue in hydrology. It is usually limited to comparing simulated and measured streamflows, while many other fluxes and storages are also simulated. This is especially true for spatially distributed models, for which multivariable and multiscale validation procedures are needed. Such an approach has been tested on the Fecht research basin (Vosges Massif, France) over a 5-year period, using the semidistributed conceptual MC model, whose physical soundness has been improved. The catchment discretization into land units was based on simple physiographic criteria, which were statistically validated. Water balance parameters were derived from measured soil water retention, without any calibration. Catchment streamflow was used to calibrate water transfer parameters over a single year and validate the model. Two subcatchments were used for the internal validation, and two neighboring nested catchments were used for the regional transposition of both the model and its distributed parameterization. At the mesh scale (250 to 1000 m), snowpack and soil water storages and contribution to streamflow were validated by using measurements from two small catchments. Despite the very limited calibration, the results were generally satisfactory. Nash-Sutcliffe efficiencies on daily streamflow varied from 0.92 in calibration to 0.89 in validation and 0.71 in transposition. The results of the simulated patterns of fluxes and storages can therefore be considered with some confidence.
引用
收藏
页码:1467 / 1481
页数:15
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Abbott M.B., Bathurst J.C., Cunge J.A., O'Connell P.E., Rasmussen J., An introduction to the European Hydrological System‐Système Hydrologique Européen “SHE,” 1, History and philosophy of a physically‐based distributed modelling system, J. Hydrol., 87, pp. 45-59, (1986)
[2]  
Ambroise B., Méthodes d'étude de la variabilité spatiale du cyçle hydrique dans le petit bassin du Ringelbach, IAHS Publ., 193, pp. 327-334, (1990)
[3]  
Ambroise B., Topography and the water cycle in a temperate middle mountain environment: the need for interdisciplinary experiments, Agric. For. Meteorol., 73, pp. 217-235, (1995)
[4]  
Ambroise B., Viville D., Spatial variability of textural and hydrodynamical properties in a soil unit of the Ringelbach study catchment, Vosges (France), Z. Geomorphol. Suppl., 58, pp. 21-34, (1986)
[5]  
Ambroise B., Reutenauer D., Viville D., Estimating soil water retention properties from mineral and organic fractions of coarsetextured soils in the Vosges Mountains of France, Indirect Methods for Estimating the Hydraulic Properties of Unsaturated Soils, pp. 453-462, (1992)
[6]  
Beven K.J., Changing ideas in hydrology‐The case of physicallybased models, J. Hydrol., 105, pp. 157-172, (1989)
[7]  
Cappus P., Bassin expérimental d'Alrance‐Etude des lois de l'é‐coulement‐Application au calcul et à la prévision des débits, Houille Blanche, 15, A, pp. 493-520, (1960)
[8]  
Choisnel E., Un modéle agrométéorologique opérationnel de bilan hydrique utilisant des données climatiques, Les Besoins en Eau des Cultures, pp. 115-132, (1985)
[9]  
Coutagne A., Etude générale des variations de débits en fonction des facteurs qui les conditionnent, 2, Les variations de débit en période non influencée par les précipitations, Houille Blanche, 3, pp. 416-436, (1948)
[10]  
BMDP Statistical Software 1981, (1981)