EVALUATION OF TISSUE ADHESIVES IN CLOSURE OF SCLERAL TUNNEL INCISIONS

被引:40
作者
KIM, JC [1 ]
BASSAGE, SD [1 ]
KEMPSKI, MH [1 ]
DELCERRO, M [1 ]
PARK, SB [1 ]
AQUAVELLA, JV [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV ROCHESTER,CORNEA RES LAB,NEW YORK,NY
关键词
BURSTING PRESSURE; CYANOACRYLATE GLUE; FIBRIN GLUE; SCLERAL TUNNEL INCISION; SHEAR BONDING POWER; SUTURELESS INCISION;
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80141-1
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 [眼科学];
摘要
Using a biomechanical wound strength model, we compared the efficacy of cyanoacrylate and fibrin glues used to close scleral tunnel incisions. Scleral tunnel incisions were made in four groups of rabbits: (1) traditional self-sealing incision, (2) modified non-self-sealing incision, (3) method 2, closed with cyanoacrylate glue, or (4) method 2, closed with fibrin glue. Overall, Groups 1 and 4 showed the least clinical reaction, the slightest decrease in intraocular pressure (which recovered to baseline by day 7), and the most significant recovery of postoperative astigmatism. Initially, the bursting pressure in Groups 1 and 3 was statistically the highest (P <.005). By day 3, wound strengths in Groups 1 and 4 were comparable. Bursting pressure decreased in Groups 2 and 3 by day 7. Our results indicate that clinical responses, intraocular pressure, induced astigmatism, and ultimately wound strength were comparable in fibrin-glue-closed scleral pocket and sutureless self-sealing cataract incisions. Although cyanoacrylate glue cures immediately and initially demonstrates a strong adhesive quality, it causes a severe inflammatory response that inhibits subsequent collagen remodeling. Fibrin tissue adhesives may have an application as adjunctive means of closing scleral tunnel incisions.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 325
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Koch PS, Structural analysis of cataract incision construction, J Cataract Refract Surg, 17, pp. 661-667, (1991)
[2]
Steinert RF, Brint SF, White SM, Fine IH, Astigmatism after small incision cataract surgery, A prospective, randomized, multicenter comparison of 4- and 6.5-mm incisions. Ophthalmology, 98, pp. 417-424, (1991)
[3]
Sanders DR, Shepherd J, Ernest PH, Et al., Effect of incision size and suture configuration on induced astigmatism and visual rehabilitation, Small-Incision Cataract Surgery
[4]
Foldable Lenses, One-Stitch Surgery, Sutureless Surgery, Astigmatic Keratotomy, pp. 15-25, (1990)
[5]
Maloney WF, Shapiro DR, Universal small incision for cataract surgery, J Cataract Refract Surg, 17, pp. 702-705, (1991)
[6]
Masket S, Keratorefractive aspects of the scleral pocket incision and closure method for cataract surgery, J Cataract Refract Surg, 15, pp. 70-77, (1989)
[7]
Fine IH, Architecture and construction of a self-sealing incision for cataract surgery, J Cataract Refract Surg, 17, pp. 672-676, (1991)
[8]
Grabow HB, Early results of 500 cases of no-stitch cataract surgery, J Cataract Refract Surg, 17, pp. 726-730, (1991)
[9]
Stonecipher KG, Parmley VC, Jensen H, Rowsey JJ, Infectious endophthalmitis following sutureless cataract surgery, Arch Ophthalmol, 109, pp. 1562-1563, (1991)
[10]
Hessburg TP, Maxwell DP, Diamond JG, Endophthalmitis associated with sutureless cataract surgery, Arch Ophthalmol, 109, (1991)