GT OF THE CHEST - MINIMAL TUBE CURRENT REQUIRED FOR GOOD IMAGE QUALITY WITH THE LEAST RADIATION-DOSE

被引:132
作者
MAYO, JR
HARTMAN, TE
LEE, KS
PRIMACK, SL
VEDAL, S
MULLER, NL
机构
[1] VANCOUVER GEN HOSP,HLTH SCI CTR,VANCOUVER,BC V5Z 1M9,CANADA
[2] MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,DEPT DIAGNOST RADIOL,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
[3] SAMSUNG MED CTR,DEPT DIAGNOST RADIOL & MED IMAGING,SEOUL 135230,SOUTH KOREA
[4] OREGON HLTH SCI UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT DIAGNOST RADIOL,PORTLAND,OR 97201
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.164.3.7863879
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. We wanted to determine minimal tube current (mAs) required for consistently good image quality on conventional 10-mm collimation chest CT and effect of tube current reduction on detection of mediastinal and lung abnormalities, Tube current reduction is desirable to reduce patient radiation dose. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Prospectively, 30 consecutive patients (mean weight, 68 kg; range, 34-93 kg) older than 45 undergoing conventional chest CT with standard technique (120 kVp, 400 mAs) had four additional sections imaged at reduced tube current (200, 140, 80, 20 mAs) at two levels (tracheal carina and left atrium), CT scans were evaluated in random order by two independent observers who were blinded to technical factors used, Subjective image quality was graded on a five-point scale from nondiagnostic to excellent. Visualization of mediastinal adenopathy (n = 18), pleural plaques (n =17), effusions (n = 28), lung parenchymal nodules (n= 37), and emphysema (n = 15) were assessed, The 400 mAs scan was considered the reference standard. RESULTS. When compared with the reference technique (400 mAs), the first and second (200 mAs and 140 mAs) reduction levers showed no significant difference(p>.05) in subjective image quality, A significant difference (p<.001) was seen at the third and fourth (80 mAs and 20 mAs) reduction levels, However, no significant difference (p>.05) was seen in detection of mediastinal or lung parenchymal abnormalities with different tube currents. CONCLUSION. A twofold reduction in tube current (400-140 mAs) and resultant radiation dose did not cause a significant change in subjective image quality or in detection of mediastinal or lung abnormalities with conventional chest CT, One hundred forty milliampere-seconds is the minimal tube current required to provide good image quality in patients of average weight,
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 607
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] NOISE DUE TO PHOTON-COUNTING STATISTICS IN COMPUTED X-RAY TOMOGRAPHY
    CHESLER, DA
    RIEDERER, SJ
    PELC, NJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1977, 1 (01) : 64 - 74
  • [2] IN SEARCH OF THE APPROPRIATE USE OF CHEST COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
    DIMARCO, AF
    RENSTON, JP
    [J]. CHEST, 1994, 106 (02) : 332 - 333
  • [3] IS CHEST CT PERFORMED TOO OFTEN
    DIMARCO, AF
    BRIONES, B
    [J]. CHEST, 1993, 103 (04) : 985 - 986
  • [4] HAAGA JR, 1991, RADIOLOGY, V138, P449
  • [5] HIGH-RESOLUTION CT OF THE CHEST - RADIATION-DOSE
    MAYO, JR
    JACKSON, SA
    MULLER, NL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1993, 160 (03) : 479 - 481
  • [6] PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNERS, WITH ILLUSTRATIONS FROM EMI, ACTA, AND DELTA SCANNERS
    MCCULLOUGH, EC
    PAYNE, JT
    BAKER, HL
    HATTERY, RR
    SHEEDY, PF
    STEPHENS, DH
    GEDGAUDUS, E
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1976, 120 (01) : 173 - 188
  • [7] LOW-DOSE CT OF THE LUNGS - PRELIMINARY-OBSERVATIONS
    NAIDICH, DP
    MARSHALL, CH
    GRIBBIN, C
    ARAMS, RS
    MCCAULEY, DI
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1990, 175 (03) : 729 - 731
  • [8] IS THORACIC CT PERFORMED OFTEN ENOUGH
    NAIDICH, DP
    PIZZARELLO, D
    GARAY, SM
    MULLER, NL
    [J]. CHEST, 1994, 106 (02) : 331 - 332
  • [9] DETERMINATIONS OF ORGAN DOSES AND EFFECTIVE DOSE EQUIVALENTS FROM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC EXAMINATION
    NISHIZAWA, K
    MARUYAMA, T
    TAKAYAMA, M
    OKADA, M
    HACHIYA, J
    FURUYA, Y
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1991, 64 (757) : 20 - 28
  • [10] RADIATION-DOSE IN CT
    ROTHENBERG, LN
    PENTLOW, KS
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 1992, 12 (06) : 1225 - 1243