DIVERGENT DEVELOPMENTAL PATTERNS FOR INFANTS PERCEPTION OF 2 NONNATIVE CONSONANT CONTRASTS

被引:111
作者
BEST, CT
MCROBERTS, GW
LAFLEUR, R
SILVERISENSTADT, J
机构
[1] WESLEYAN UNIV,MIDDLETOWN,CT 06457
[2] STANFORD UNIV,STANFORD,CA 94305
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SPEECH PERCEPTION; NATIVE CONTRASTS; NONNATIVE CONTRASTS; NATIVE CATEGORIES; DISCRIMINATION; DEVELOPMENTAL PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1016/0163-6383(95)90022-5
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Young infants discriminate nonnative and native consonant contrasts, yet 10-12-month-olds discriminate most nonnative contrasts poorly, like adults. However, English-speaking adults and 6-14 month-old infants discriminate Zulu clicks, consistent with a model predicting that listeners who have a native phonology assimilate nonnative consonants to native categories when possible but hear non-assimilable (NA) consonants as nonspeech sounds (Best, McRoberts, & Sithole, 1988). Non-assimilable contrasts, thus, avoid language-specific effects and are discriminated, whereas consonants assimilated equally into a single category (SC) are discriminated poorly by listeners showing language-specific influences; other possible assimilation patterns show poor to excellent discrimination. This study directly compared discrimination of NA clicks and SC ejectives by 6-8- and 10-12-month-olds with a conditioned fixation habituation procedure. Consistent with predictions, the younger group discriminated both nonnative contrasts and a control English contrast, whereas the older group discriminated only the NA and English contrasts.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 350
页数:12
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
ASLIN RN, 1980, CHILD PHONOLOGY, V1
[2]  
Best CatherineT., 1994, DEV SPEECH PERCEPTIO
[3]   EXAMINATION OF PERCEPTUAL REORGANIZATION FOR NONNATIVE SPEECH CONTRASTS - ZULU CLICK DISCRIMINATION BY ENGLISH-SPEAKING ADULTS AND INFANTS [J].
BEST, CT ;
MCROBERTS, GW ;
SITHOLE, NM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1988, 14 (03) :345-360
[4]   EFFECTS OF PHONOLOGICAL AND PHONETIC FACTORS ON CROSS-LANGUAGE PERCEPTION OF APPROXIMANTS [J].
BEST, CT ;
STRANGE, W .
JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 1992, 20 (03) :305-330
[5]  
BEST CT, 1984, ADV PEDIATRIC PSYCHO, V2
[6]  
BEST CT, IN PRESS ADV INFNACY, V8
[7]  
BEST CT, 1994, SPEECH PERCEPTION LI
[8]  
BEST CT, 1993, DEV NEUROCOGNITION S
[10]   NON-CATEGORICAL PERCEPTION OF STOP CONSONANTS DIFFERING IN VOT [J].
CARNEY, AE ;
WIDIN, GP ;
VIEMEISTER, NF .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1977, 62 (04) :961-970