VALIDATING INTERPRETIVE ARGUMENTS FOR LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

被引:57
作者
KANE, MT
机构
[1] University of Wisconsin, Madison
关键词
D O I
10.1177/016327879401700202
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
To validate the interpretation assigned to test scores is to support the rationale for this interpretation. The interpretations for licensure and certification tests involve a sequence of inferences, or an argument, leading from the test score to decisions about licensure or certification. This article examines several possible interpretive arguments for licensure and certification test scores and analyzes the evidence required to support each type of argument. Particular attention is given to a competency-based argument that involves a sequence of several inferences leading from test scores to statements about competence, and then to conclusions about expected performance in practice. Decisions about licensure or certification are based on expected performance in practice.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 159
页数:27
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
American Educational Research Association American Psychological Association National Council on Measurement in Education, 2014, STAND ED PSYCH TEST
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, VALIDITY ED MEASUREM
[3]  
Benner P., 1984, NOVICE EXPERT
[4]  
BRENNAN RL, 1982, ELEMENTS GENERALIZAB
[5]  
Cronbach L., 1971, ED MEASUREMENT
[6]  
CRONBACH LJ, 1972, DEPENDABILITY BEHAVI
[7]  
CRONBACH LJ, 1980, NEW DIRECTIONS TESTI
[8]   NARRATIVES OF CONSTRUCT-VALIDATION [J].
ENGEL, JD .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 1994, 17 (02) :222-235
[9]   THE ASSESSMENT OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE [J].
KANE, MT .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 1992, 15 (02) :163-182
[10]   AN ARGUMENT-BASED APPROACH TO VALIDITY [J].
KANE, MT .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (03) :527-535